Allen L. Meyers v. City of Cleveland Edward H. Richard Joseph Randy, Jr., 772 F.2d 907 (6th Cir. 1985). · Go Syfert
Search
Allen L. Meyers v. City of Cleveland Edward H. Richard Joseph Randy, Jr., 772 F.2d 907 (6th Cir. 1985). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
39 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Idit Dobbs-Weinstein, Plaintiff-Appellant/ Cross-Appellee v. Vanderbilt University, Defendant-Appellee (ca6, 1999-08-26)
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985 2005 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Idit Dobbs-Weinstein, Plaintiff-Appellant/ Cross-Appellee v. Vanderbilt University, Defendant-Appellee
6th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Langland v. Vanderbilt Univ., 589 F.Supp. 995, 1003 (M.D.Tenn.1984), aff’d, 772 F.2d 907 , 1985 WL 13611 (6th Cir. Aug. 19, 1985) (unpublished and per curiam).
cited Cited "see" Dobbs-Weinstein v. Vanderbilt University
M.D. Tenn. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Langland v. Vanderbilt Univ., 589 F.Supp. 995, 1003 (M.D.Tenn.1984), aff 'd, 772 F.2d 907 , 1985 WL 13611 (6th Cir.1985).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Allen L. Meyers
v.
City of Cleveland Edward H. Richard Joseph Randy, Jr.
84-3731.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Aug 6, 1985.
772 F.2d 907
Unpublished

772 F.2d 907

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
ALLEN L. MEYERS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
CITY OF CLEVELAND; EDWARD H. RICHARD; JOSEPH RANDY, JR.,
DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES.

NO. 84-3731

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

8/6/85

N.D.Ohio

AFFIRMED

ORDER

1

BEFORE: KRUPANSKY and MILBURN, Circuit Judges; NEESE, District Judge.[*]

2

This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof,

3

IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the District Court be, and it hereby is, affirmed upon the opinion of the District Court.

*

The Honorable C.G. Neese, United States District Judge for the Middle District of Tennessee, sitting by designation