green
Positive treatment
2.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Pauline Walber D/B/A Walber Construction Co. v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, Jack Kemp, Secretary
See Management Science America, Inc. v. United States, 598 F.Supp. 223, 225 (N.D.Ga.1984), aff'd, 778 F.2d 792 (1985). 16 The CDA provides that contractors, such as Walber, whose claims were not decided by an agency contracting officer as of March 1, 1979, the effective date of the CDA, have the right to "elect" to have their contract disputes resolved under the provisions of the CDA or to continue to follow pre-CDA procedures.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. J & E Salvage Company John Darlington Teresa N. Darlington, of the Estate of Edward Darlington
(2×)
Sec. 605 (b); see also Management Science America, Inc. v. Pierce, 598 F.Supp. 223, 225 (N.D.Ga.1984), aff'd, 778 F.2d 792 (11th Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mark Dunning Industries, Inc. v. Cheney
See also Management Science America, Inc. v. Pierce, 598 F.Supp. 223 (N.D.Ga.1984) (jurisdiction in dispute over termination of government contract was properly in Claims Court, despite plaintiffs characterization of claim as violation of federal procurement regulations), aff’d 778 F.2d 792 (11th Cir.1985); Group Health, Inc. v. Schweiker, 549 F.Supp. 135 (S.D.Fla.1982) (declining to exercise jurisdiction over claim arising from non-renewal of Medicare provider’s contract because claim was properly before Claims Court despite plaintiffs’ characterization of action as demand for a hearing…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Glasker
v.
Paper Products Co
v.
Paper Products Co
85-8357.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Nov 21, 1985.
Published
*Glasker
v.
Paper Products Co.
85-8357
United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.
11/21/85
1
S.D.Ga.
AFFIRMED
2
---------------
* Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 11th Cir.R. 23.