Balogh's Of Coral Gables, Inc. v. Getz, 785 F.2d 895 (11th Cir. 1986). · Go Syfert
Search
Balogh's Of Coral Gables, Inc. v. Getz, 785 F.2d 895 (11th Cir. 1986). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
3 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Collins v. State (fladistctapp, 1997-09-12)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Collins v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1997 · signal: see also · confidence low
Since the probative value of the testimony of a witness who is called only to impeach is low, and the danger is significant that the jury will be prejudiced by the evidence used to attack credibility, the application of § 90.403 will frequently exclude attacks on the credibility of a witness who is called as a device to place the impeaching evidence before the jury. *1340 Id. at 379-80 (footnotes omitted); see also Balogh's of Coral Gables, Inc. v. Getz, 778 F.2d 649 (11th Cir.1985), rehearing granted and opinion vacated, 785 F.2d 895 (11th Cir.1986) original opinion reinstated in pertinent p…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Balogh's of Coral Gables, Inc., David R. Balogh, Inc., and Balogh Jewelers of Hallandale, Inc.
v.
Irving Getz, Mayor's Jewelers, Inc., and Rolex Watch, USA
84-5731.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Mar 14, 1986.
785 F.2d 895
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

785 F.2d 895

1986-1 Trade Cases 67,098

BALOGH'S OF CORAL GABLES, INC., David R. Balogh, Inc., and
Balogh Jewelers of Hallandale, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Irving GETZ, Mayor's Jewelers, Inc., and Rolex Watch, USA,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 84-5731.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.

March 14, 1986.

Joel D. Eaton, Podhurst, Orseck, Parks, Josefsberg, Eaton, Meadow & Olin, P.A. Miami, Fla., for plaintiffs-appellants.

David L. Ross, Greenberg, Traurig, Hoffman, Lipoff, Quental & Wolff, P.A., Miami, Fla., for Getz/Mayor's.

Brian F. Spector, Kenny Nachwalter & Seymour, P.A., Miami, Fla., and Stephen Ruffino, Gibney, Anthony & Flaherty, Donald J. Williamson, John F. Flaherty, New York City, for Rolex.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida; Jose A. Gonzalez, Jr., Judge.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion December 16, 1985, 11th Cir., 1985, 778 F.2d 649)

Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, RONEY, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, VANCE, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

1

A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

2

IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by this Court en banc without oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of en banc briefs. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.