Chotin Transp. Inc., Cross-Appellee v. United States of Am., Cross-Appellant, 793 F.2d 136 (6th Cir. 1986). · Go Syfert
Search
Chotin Transp. Inc., Cross-Appellee v. United States of Am., Cross-Appellant, 793 F.2d 136 (6th Cir. 1986). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
21 citation events (14 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Northeast Ohio Coalition for the Homeless v. Secretary of Ohio (ca6, 2012-08-30)
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986 2006 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Northeast Ohio Coalition for the Homeless v. Secretary of Ohio (2×)
6th Cir. · 2012 · confidence medium
The defendants cite In re Lybarger, 793 F.2d 136, 138 (6th Cir.1986), to support their argument that the inclusion of language referring to the parties’ desire to settle the action “without the burden of protracted litigation” demonstrates the intent of the parties to resolve all claims.
discussed Cited "see" Cassino v. Reichhold Chemicals, Inc.
9th Cir. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Lybarger, 793 F.2d 136, 137 (6th Cir.1986) (settlement of ADEA claim morning of scheduled trial); Runyan v. Nat’l Cash Register Corp., 787 F.2d 1039, 1040-41 (6th Cir.) (en banc) (release of all claims after allegation of age discrimination and acceptance of increased compensation for duration of consulting agreement), cert, denied, _ U.S. _, 107 S.Ct. 178 , 93 L.Ed.2d 114 (1986).
discussed Cited "see" 47 Fair empl.prac.cas. 865, 43 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 37,062, 23 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 17 Gerard A. Cassino and Sally Cassino v. Reichhold Chemicals, Inc., a New York Corporation
9th Cir. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Lybarger, 793 F.2d 136, 137 (6th Cir.1986) (settlement of ADEA claim morning of scheduled trial); Runyan v. Nat'l Cash Register Corp., 787 F.2d 1039, 1040-41 (6th Cir.) (en banc) (release of all claims after allegation of age discrimination and acceptance of increased compensation for duration of consulting agreement), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 107 S.Ct. 178 , 93 L.Ed.2d 114 (1986).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Burke v. Burke
Va. Ct. App. · 2008 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence medium
See e.g., In re Lybarger, 793 F.2d 136, 139 (6th Cir.1986) (“[W]e hold that plaintiff waived her right to appeal the District Court’s determination regarding the amount of attorney’s fees in the Consent Decree.”); United States Consol.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Ziyad Mini Market v. United States
W.D.N.Y. · 2003 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence medium
See, e.g., In re Lybarger, 793 F.2d 136, 137 (6th Cir.1986) (upholding settlement agreement in which parties agreed that court’s determination of attorney’s fee would be final and the “parties waive all rights of appeal and further review”); Brown v. Gillette, 723 F.2d 192, 192-93 (1st Cir.1983) (upholding settlement agreement in which parties stipulated that determinations to be made by district court would be “final and binding” and waiving all appellate rights).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Chotin Transportation Inc., Cross-Appellee
v.
United States of America, Cross-Appellant
85-5138.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Jun 17, 1986.
793 F.2d 136
Published

793 F.2d 136

CHOTIN TRANSPORTATION INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, Cross-Appellee,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee, Cross-Appellant.

Nos. 84-5652, 85-5138.

United States Court of Appeals,
Sixth Circuit.

June 17, 1986.

Before LIVELY, Chief Judge, ENGEL, KEITH, MERRITT, KENNEDY, MARTIN, JONES, CONTIE, KRUPANSKY, WELLFORD, MILBURN, GUY, NELSON, RYAN and BOGGS, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

2

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this Court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket as a pending appeal.

3

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this Court, 784 F.2d 206, is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

4

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as practicable.