Nat'l Wildlife Fed'n v. United States Forest Serv., & Davidson Indus., Inc., Defendants-Intervenors/appellees, 801 F.2d 360 (9th Cir. 1986). · Go Syfert
Search
Nat'l Wildlife Fed'n v. United States Forest Serv., & Davidson Indus., Inc., Defendants-Intervenors/appellees, 801 F.2d 360 (9th Cir. 1986). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
3 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION, Et Al., Plaintiffs/Appellants,
v.
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, Et Al., Defendants, and Davidson Industries, Inc., Et Al., Defendants-Intervenors/Appellees
84-4274.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Sep 30, 1986.
801 F.2d 360
Terence L. Thatcher, National Wildlife Federation, Portland, Or., for plaintiffs/appellants., Phillip Chadsey, Stoel, Rives, Boley, Fraser & Wyse, Portland, Or., Robert R. Steenland, Jr., Claire L. McGurie, Robert L. Klarquist, Dept, of Justice, Patrick M. Han-lon, Shea & Gardner, Washington, D.C., for defendants-intervenors/appellees.
Alarcon, Reinhardt, Thompson.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

Pursuant to the parties’ Joint Report, we vacate the last clause of paragraph six of the district court’s amended judgment, to wit, the words: “or in the alternative, the federal defendants must include a worst case analysis and an analysis of cumulative impacts in the environmental assessment[*361] for each timeber sale in the Seven Year Action Plan.” Pursuant to the Forest Service’s concessions at oral argument, and upon our resolution of the issues on appeal which the parties have been unable to settle, we also vacate all of paragraph seven of the district court’s amended judgment. The remainder of the judgment shall remain in effect. The appeal is dismissed.

This order is filed concurrently with an unpublished memorandum disposition, 803 F.2d 724, 9th Cir.R. 21.