green
Positive treatment
1.7 score
G Cite
cited 14× by 14 distinct cases ·
“To prevent double payment of fees for the same work under both [the EAJA and § 406(b)], however, congress directed that the smaller amount be given to the client.”
cited 3× by 2 distinct cases ·
" Costs for travel expenses and postage fees are not authorized"
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Pettyjohn v. Chater
Under Weakley v. Bowen, 803 F.2d at 580, costs for travel expenses are not authorized under the EAJA and I agree Pettyjohn may recover neither the 4 hours claimed by Ms. Higinbotham nor the 2.8 hours claimed by Mr. Hayes for travel to Denver for oral argument.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Paul C. “Paulie” VILLANO, Defendant-Appellant
v.
Paul C. “Paulie” VILLANO, Defendant-Appellant
85-2535.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.
Oct 14, 1986.
Holloway, Barrett, McKay, Logan, Seymour, Anderson, Tacha, Baldock.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
[*581] This matter comes on for consideration of appellant’s petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc.
Upon consideration whereof, the court grants the petition and orders the case reheard en banc.
The court’s opinion filed August 5, 1986, is withdrawn and the judgment entered the same date is vacated.
Further, the case will be set for argument on rehearing during the January, 1987, Term of Court. Counsel will be subsequently notified of the time and date of argument.
The parties may file supplemental briefs, original and ten copies, on or before November 8, 1986.