Kemp v. Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co., 805 F.2d 1152 (4th Cir. 1986). · Go Syfert
Kemp v. Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co., 805 F.2d 1152 (4th Cir. 1986). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
23 citation events (8 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986 2006 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Lincoln v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs
4th Cir. · 2014 · confidence medium
This interpretation is consistent with the purposes of the LHWCA, one of which is to lessen the occasions where attorney’s fees are incurred by encouraging claimants to resolve their disputes “without the necessity of relying on assistance other than that provided by the Secretary of Labor.” Kemp v. Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co., 805 F.2d 1152, 1153 (4th Cir.1986) (per curiam).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Dyer v. Cenex Harvest States Cooperative
9th Cir. · 2009 · confidence medium
In Kemp v. Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co., 805 F.2d 1152, 1153 (4th Cir.1986), it held that a claimant is not entitled under § 928(a) to pre-controversion attorney’s fees, but it predicated its decision on deference to the BRB’s then-current interpretation of the section.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Day v. James Marine Inc
6th Cir. · 2008 · confidence medium
Page 5 of relying on assistance other than that provided by the Secretary of Labor.” Kemp v. Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co., 805 F.2d 1152, 1153 (4th Cir. 1986).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Day v. James Marine, Inc. (2×)
6th Cir. · 2008 · confidence medium
While authorizing fee shifting in discrete circumstances, the amendments created a mechanism for identifying, and resolving, disputes without incurring any attorney’s fees — “without the necessity of relying on assistance other than that provided by the Secretary of Labor.” Kemp v. Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co., 805 F.2d 1152, 1153 (4th Cir.1986).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) National Mining Ass'n v. Chao
D.D.C. · 2001 · confidence medium
The Longshore Act is ambiguous as to the extent of liability, see Clinchfield Coal Co. v. Harris, 149 F.3d 307, 310-11 (4th Cir.1998); Kemp v. Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Co., 805 F.2d 1152, 1153 (4th Cir.1986), and the DOL may resolve ambiguity through regulation.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Brown v. Army & Air Force Ex
4th Cir. · 1998 · confidence medium
Finally, by her own admission, Brown was not injured while she attended the _________________________________________________________________ 12 See Kemp v. Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co., 805 F.2d 1152, 1153 (4th Cir. 1986). 5 social gathering.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Coward v. Newport News Shipbld
4th Cir. · 1998 · confidence medium
AFFIRMED _________________________________________________________________ 5 See Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 434 -35 (1983). 6 See Flowers v. Marine Concrete Structures, Inc., 19 BRBS 162, 1986 WL 66389 , *2 (BRB No. 82-138 Feb. 28, 1986). 7 See 33 U.S.C.A. § 928 (a), (c) (West 1986); Kemp v. Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co., 805 F.2d 1152, 1153 (4th Cir. 1986) (holding claimant responsible for attorney's fees incurred prior to employer's controversion of claim for disability compensation). 4
discussed Cited "see" Todd Shipyards Corporation, Aetna Casualty and Surety Company v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, Melvin Watts
9th Cir. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See Kemp v. Newport News Shipbuilding, 805 F.2d 1152 , 1153 & n. 3 (4th Cir.1986) (Congress intended that disputes first be resolved without the parties having to rely on assistance other than that provided by the Department of Labor).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Weaver v. Ingalls Shipbuilding, Inc.
5th Cir. · 2002 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence medium
See, e.g., Kemp v. Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co., 805 F.2d 1152, 1152 (4th Cir.1986) (in which employer implicitly conceded liability for fees accrued post-contr-oversion but within the thirty-day window by appealing only those fees accrued before controversion).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ralph N. Kemp
v.
Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Company, and Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor
86-1515.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Nov 26, 1986.
805 F.2d 1152
Cited by 6 opinions  |  Published

805 F.2d 1152

1988 A.M.C. 1517

Ralph N. KEMP, Petitioner,
v.
NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING AND DRY DOCK COMPANY, and
Director, Office of Workers' Compensation
Programs, United States Department of
Labor, Respondents.

No. 86-1515.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Argued Oct. 10, 1986.
Decided Nov. 26, 1986.

Susan R. Stevick (Patten, Wornom & Watkins, Newport News, Va., on brief), for petitioner.

Lawrence P. Postol (Seyfarth, Shaw, Fairweather & Geraldson, Washington, D.C., on brief), for respondents.

Before SPROUSE and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Ralph Kemp appeals the judgment of the Benefits Review Board denying the award of attorney's fees incurred prior to his employer's controversion of his claim for disability compensation. We affirm.

2

On January 13, 1981, Kemp filed a claim under the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act for compensation from Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Company for hearing loss. The employer filed a notice of controversion on January 26, 1981. Before the hearing, the parties settled. The deputy commissioner awarded attorney's fees for services rendered by Kemp's counsel, including payment for three hours and five minutes of work performed prior to the date the employer controverted liability. The employer appealed the fee award for this time only. In an unpublished opinion, the Benefits Review Board modified the award, finding the employer liable only for fees incurred after it filed its notice of controversion.

3

The Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act provides that an employer is liable for attorney's fees if it controverts its liability on or before 30 days after receiving notice of the claim and the claimant thereafter utilizes the services of an attorney in a successful prosecution of the claim. 33 U.S.C. Sec. 928(a).[1] The Benefits Review Board has interpreted the statute to limit an employer's liability to fees incurred after the employer receives notice of the claim and disputes it. See Baker v. Todd Shipyards Corp., 12 BRBS 309 (1980); Jones v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co., 11 BRBS 7 (1979).

4

Kemp argues that the Board's interpretation ignores the fact that, as a practical matter, a potential claimant may require an attorney's services to initiate a claim. He asserts that the Board's limitation not only places an onerous burden on a claimant but also diminishes the compensation payable to a claimant in disregard of the Act.[2] Kemp relies primarily on the dissents in Baker, 12 BRBS at 317, and Jones, 11 BRBS at 19 (Miller, Administrative Appeals Judge, dissenting).

5

We may set aside the Board's decision on this matter only if it is "arbitrary, capricious or an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with the law." 5 U.S.C. Sec. 706. If the Board's construction is "sufficiently reasonable," it must be accepted, even if it is not the only reasonable construction or the construction this court would have reached if originally deciding the question. F.E.C. v. Democratic Senatorial Campaign Comm., 454 U.S. 27, 39, 102 S.Ct. 38, 46, 70 L.Ed.2d 23 (1981). Although the statute is ambiguous, the Board's interpretation can be reconciled with the text and the legislative history. Furthermore, it is consistent with congressional intent that disputes be resolved in the first instance without the necessity of relying on assistance other than that provided by the Secretary of Labor.[3] See Jones, 11 BRBS at 15-16.

6

AFFIRMED.

1

The statute provides:

If the employer or carrier declines to pay any compensation on or before the thirtieth day after receiving written notice of a claim for compensation having been filed from the deputy commissioner, on the ground that there is no liability for compensation within the provisions of this chapter, and the person seeking benefits shall thereafter have utilized the services of an attorney at law in the successful prosecution of his claim, there shall be awarded, in addition to the award of compensation, in a compensation order, a reasonable attorney's fee against the employer or carrier in an amount approved by the deputy commissioner, Board, or court, as the case may be, which shall be paid directly by the employer or carrier to the attorney for the claimant in a lump sum after the compensation order becomes final.

2

33 U.S.C. Sec. 928(d) provides in part: "The amounts awarded against an employer or carrier as attorney's fees, costs, fees and mileage for witnesses shall not in any respect affect or diminish the compensation payable under this chapter."

3

33 U.S.C. Sec. 939(c)(1) provides in part:

The Secretary shall, upon request, provide persons covered by this chapter with information and assistance relating to the chapter's coverage and compensation and the procedures for obtaining such compensation and including assistance in processing a claim. The Secretary may, upon request, provide persons covered by this chapter with legal assistance in processing a claim.

Referring to this section, the legislative history discloses: "It is intended that this assistance be all inclusive and enable the employee to receive the maximum benefits due to him without having to rely on outside assistance other than that provided by the Secretary." S. Rep. No. 92-1125, 92d Cong., 2d Sess. 16 (1972), reprinted in Committee Print: Legislative History of the Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act Amendments of 1972 at 77.