Ali Razak v. Uber Tech. Inc, 979 F.3d 192 (3rd Cir. 2020). · Go Syfert
Search
Ali Razak v. Uber Tech. Inc, 979 F.3d 192 (3rd Cir. 2020). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 3 distinct cases · …here there are genuine questions of material fact that need resolution, these questions must go to a fact-finder. this case presents such genuine disputes of material facts ⚠ not in text Topic ↗
30 citation events (30 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In Re: U Lock, Inc v. (ca3, 2025-09-30)
Treatment trajectory · 2021 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2021 2023 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) In Re: U Lock, Inc v.
3rd Cir. · 2025 · signal: cf. · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the minimum wage and overtime wage provisions at issue all require that plaintiffs prove that they are 'employees.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) RAZAK v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
E.D. Pa. · 2024 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
here there are genuine questions of material fact that need resolution, these questions must go to a fact-finder. this case presents such genuine disputes of material facts
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) RAZAK v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
E.D. Pa. · 2024 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
here there are genuine questions of material fact that need resolution, these questions must go to a fact-finder. this case presents such genuine disputes of material facts
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) RAZAK v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
E.D. Pa. · 2024 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
here there are genuine questions of material fact that need resolution, these questions must go to a fact-finder. this case presents such genuine disputes of material facts
discussed Cited "see" Naftali Kunstlinger v. Lincoln Benefit Life Co (2×)
3rd Cir. · 2025 · signal: see · confidence high
See Razak v. Uber Techs., Inc., 951 F.3d 137 , 145 n.8 (3d Cir. 2020) (“Summary judgment is correctly granted in many situations where the parties genuinely dispute facts but where the dispute is not material to the adjudication of the case.”), amended, 979 F.3d 192 (3d Cir. 2020). 4 4 The parties’ dispute about whether the Policy should have entered grace on December 15, 2020, based on the surrender value at that time, is not material to whether the Policy lapsed because the Policy did not lapse due to Kunstlinger’s failure to heed the December 2020 grace notice.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ali Razak
v.
Uber Technologies Inc
18-1944.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Nov 5, 2020.
979 F.3d 192
Cited by 18 opinions  |  Published
2 passages pin-cited by 4 cases
Pinpoint authority: #23,346 of 633,719
Citer courts: E.D. Pennsylvania (3) · Third Circuit (1)

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ______________

No. 18-1944 ______________

ALI RAZAK; KENAN SABANI; KHALDOUN CHERDOUD, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, Appellants v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; GEGEN, LLC ______________

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Civil No. 2-16-cv-00573) District Judge: Hon. Michael M. Baylson ______________

Argued January 15, 2019 ______________

Before: SMITH, Chief Judge, GREENAWAY, JR., and PORTER, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AMENDING PRECEDENTIAL OPINION

.

The panel hereby ORDERS that the Opinion filed March 3, 2020 be amended to include the language appearing in angle brackets below.

The sentence at page 16 reading, “But, if a court finds that there are any issues of fact that remain in dispute, it must resolve those disputes prior to granting summary judgment” shall be amended to read: “But, if a court finds that there are any issues of <material> fact that remain in <genuine> dispute, it must resolve those disputes prior to granting summary judgment.”

The sentence at page 17 reading, “DialAmerica teaches that where there are questions of fact that need resolution, these questions must go to a fact-finder” shall be amended to read: “DialAmerica teaches that where there are <genuine> questions of <material> fact that need resolution, these questions must go to a fact-finder.”

BY THE COURT, s/ Joseph A. Greenaway, Jr. Circuit Judge

Dated: November 5, 2020 Tmm/cc: All Counsel of Record