3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Lepage's Incorporated v. 3m (Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company).
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lepage's Incorporated v. 3m (Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company) Anchor | green | “eview of a jury's verdict is limited to determining whether some evidence in the record supports the jury's verdict.” | 8 |
| 2 | Ali Razak v. Uber Technologies Inc | green | “here there are genuine questions of material fact that need resolution, these questions must go to a fact-finder. this case presents such genuine disputes of material facts” | 3 |
| 3 | Ali Razak v. Uber Technologies Inc | green | “here there are genuine questions of material fact that need resolution, these questions must go to a fact-finder. this case presents such genuine disputes of material facts” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.