green
Positive treatment
13.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
James Thomas Harmon v. State
But cf. Blackfoot Livestock Comm’n v. Dept. of Agric., 810 F.2d 916, 921 (9th Cir. 1987) (holding that “[t]he Act requires all auction transactions to be closed at the end of the next business day.”). 3: There is some evidence in the record appellant attempted to sell the purchased cattle at a livestock auction in Clovis, New Mexico, intending to use the proceeds to cover the check held by Myers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
James Thomas Harmon v. State
But cf. Blackfoot Livestock Comm’n v. Dept. of Agric., 810 F.2d 916, 921 (9th Cir. 1987) (holding that “[t]he Act requires all auction transactions to be closed at the end of the next business day.”). 3 October 14, appellant wrote a check payable to Muleshoe Livestock Auction, Inc. for the purchase price in the amount of $53,402.55.
discussed
Cited "but see"
James Thomas Harmon v. State
But cf. Blackfoot Livestock Comm'n v. Dept. of Agric., 810 F.2d 916, 921 (9th Cir. 1987) (holding that "[t]he Act requires all auction transactions to be closed at the end of the next business day."). 3.
discussed
Cited "but see"
Jonathon Antwan Donaldson v. State
But cf. Blackfoot Livestock Comm'n v. Dept. of Agric., 810 F.2d 916, 921 (9th Cir. 1987) (holding that "[t]he Act requires all auction transactions to be closed at the end of the next business day."). 3.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Beucke v. United States Department of Agriculture
Blackfoot Livestock Comm’n v. Dep’t of Agric., 810 F.2d 916, 923 (9th Cir.1987).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Beucke v. United States Department of Agriculture
Blackfoot Livestock Comm’n v. Dep’t of Agric., 810 F.2d 916, 923 (9th Cir.1987).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
MacHado v. INTERN. ASS'N OF HEAT & FROST INSULATORS
Conley, 810 F.2d at 916.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Machado v. International Ass'n of Heat & Frost Insulators & Asbestos Workers
Conley, 810 F.2d at 916.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Catalina Yachts, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
Spencer Livestock Comm’n v. Department of Agric., 841 F.2d 1451, 1456 (9th Cir.1988) (citing Butz v. Glover Livestock Comm’n Co., Inc., 411 U.S. 182, 185-86 , 93 S.Ct. 1455 , 36 L.Ed.2d 142 (1973); Blackfoot Livestock Comm’n v. Department of Agric., 810 F.2d 916, 922 (9th Cir.1987)).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Lloyd Myers Co., Inc., And/or Lloyd Myers, D/B/A Lloyd Myers Co., Inc. v. Department of Agriculture
Blackfoot Livestock Comm'n Co. v. Dept. of Agric., 810 F.2d 916, 920 (9th Cir.1987).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
A-Plus Roofing, Inc. v. U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service United States of America
Blackfoot Livestock Comm'n v. Department of Agric., 810 F.2d 916, 922 (9th Cir.1987) (quoting Butz, 411 U.S. at 189 ). 5 A-Plus argues that the ALJ acted outside the scope of discretion permitted by 8 U.S.C. § 1324a(e)(5) 1 by relying on unreliable evidence as to A-Plus' financial condition and size, and on a finding of a lack of good faith.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
New Life Bakery, Inc., Glass, Molders, Pottery, Plastics & Allied Workers International Union, Intervenor v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board, Glass, Molders, Pottery, Plastics & Allied Workers International Union, Intervenor v. New Life Bakery, Inc.
Blackfoot Livestock Comm'n Co. v. Dept. of Agriculture, 810 F.2d 916, 922 (9th Cir.1987).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Farm Fresh, Inc. v. Yeutter
Parchman, 852 F.2d at 863 (citing Blackfoot Livestock Comm'n v. Dep't of Agric., 810 F.2d 916, 920 (9th Cir.1987); Farrow v. United States Dep't of Agric., 760 F.2d 211 , 213 (8th Cir.1985); Mattes v. United States, 721 F.2d at 1128-29 ).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Central National Bank of Mattoon v. United States Department of Treasury
Blackfoot Livestock Commission Co. v. Department of Agriculture, 810 F.2d 916, 922 (9th Cir.1987); River Forest Pharmacy, Inc. v. Drug Enforcement Administration, 501 F.2d 1202, 1206 (7th Cir.1974) (per curiam); Lorain Journal Co. v. FCC, 351 F.2d 824 , 828 (D.C.Cir.1965).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Cobb v. Yeutter
Parchman v. United States Dep’t of Agric., 852 F.2d 858 (6th Cir.1988); Blackfoot Livestock Comm’n Co. v. Department of Agric., 810 F.2d 916, 920 (9th Cir.1987); American Fruit Purveyors, Inc. v. United States, 630 F.2d 370 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 997 , 101 S.Ct. 1701 , 68 L.Ed.2d 197 (1981); Hyatt v. United States, 276 F.2d 308 (10th Cir.1960).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Cobb v. Yeutter
Parchman v. United States Dep't of Agric., 852 F.2d 858 (6th Cir.1988); Blackfoot Livestock Comm'n Co. v. Department of Agric., 810 F.2d 916, 920 (9th Cir.1987); American Fruit Purveyors, Inc. v. United States, 630 F.2d 370 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 997 , 101 S.Ct. 1701 , 68 L.Ed.2d 197 (1981); Hyatt v. United States, 276 F.2d 308 (10th Cir.1960).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Altman
Blackfoot Livestock Comm'n v. Dep't v. Agric., 810 F.2d 916, 923 (9th Cir.1987). 11 The government denies the applicability of the Jencks Act to the requests made by appellant.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Robert E. Parchman Virgil R. (Ray) Lemons Jack E. Hamilton v. United States Department of Agriculture
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
Blackfoot Livestock Comm’n v. Dep’t. of Agric., 810 F.2d 916, 920 (9th Cir.1987); Farrow, 760 F.2d at 213; Mattes, 721 F.2d at 1128-29.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Spencer Livestock Commission Company Mike Donaldson v. Department of Agriculture
Butz v. Glover Livestock Com’n Co., 411 U.S. 182, 185-86 , 93 S.Ct. 1455, 1457-58 , 36 L.Ed.2d 142 (1973); Blackfoot Livestock Com’n v. Dept. of Agric., 810 F.2d 916, 922 (9th Cir.1987).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Ram LACHMAN, Defendant-Appellant
v.
Ram LACHMAN, Defendant-Appellant
85-1113.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Feb 19, 1987.
810 F.2d 916
Martin Healy, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee., Chris Cannon, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant-appellant.
Nelson, Canby, Noonan.
Published
ORDER
The petition for rehearing filed December 8, 1986, is granted. No additional briefing or argument is required. The order filed November 4, 1986, is withdrawn. The order to show cause is discharged.
The suggestion of appropriateness of rehearing en banc filed December 8, 1986, is dismissed as moot.