United States v. Joseph MacHuca Byron, 811 F.2d 1505 (4th Cir. 1987). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Joseph MacHuca Byron, 811 F.2d 1505 (4th Cir. 1987). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
43 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: McCoy v. Marto (scd, 2025-02-10)
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987 2006 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" McCoy v. Marto
D.S.C. · 2025 · signal: see · confidence high
See Peyatt v. Holland, 811 F.2d 1505, at *1 (4th Cir. 1987).
cited Cited "see" McCoy v. State of South Carolina, The
D.S.C. · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
See Peyatt v. Holland, 811 F.2d 1505, at *1 (4th Cir. 1987).
discussed Cited "see" NORTH CAROLINA FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, INC. v. STRICKLAND'S AUTO & TRUCK REPAIRS, INC.
M.D.N.C. · 2021 · signal: see · confidence high
See Smith v. HBE Corp., 655 F. Supp. 59, 66-67 (E.D.N.C. 1986) (citation omitted) (“[H]e who claims the benefit of an equitable estoppel on the ground that he has been misled by the representations of another must not have been misled through his own want of reasonable care and circumspection.”), aff’d, 811 F.2d 1505 (4th Cir. 1987); Hawkins v. M & J Fin.
discussed Cited "see" Black & Decker (U.S.) Inc. v. Pro-Tech Power Inc.
E.D. Va. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Sunbeam Corp. v. Equity Industries Corp., 635 F.Supp. 625, 629 (E.D.Va.1986) (applying these elements to an unfair competition claim), aff'd per curia, 811 F.2d 1505 (4th Cir.1987); Oakley, Inc. v. International Tropic-Cal, Inc., 923 F.2d 167 , 169 & n. 1 (Fed.Cir.1991) (reciting the same elements for a false designation of origin claim); Tools USA and Equip.
cited Cited "see" Keystone Camera Products Corp. v. Ansco Photo-Optical Products Corp.
N.D. Ill. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Sunbeam Corp. v. Equity Industries, Inc., 635 F.Supp. 625, 630 (E.D.Va.1986), aff 'd, 811 F.2d 1505 (4th Cir.1987) (per curiam).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Blocker v. AT & T TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS
M.D. Fla. · 1987 · signal: see also · confidence low
Sweet, 262 F.Supp. 561 (M.D.Fla.1967); Brownlee v. Gay & Taylor Inc., 642 F.Supp. 347, 361-62 (D.Kan.1986); Salazar v. Marathon Oil Co., 502 F.Supp. 631, 636 (S.D.Tex.1980); *214 Wheeler v. Armco Steel Corp., 471 F.Supp. 1050, 1053-54 (S.D.Tex.1979); see also Pierce v. Duke Power Co., 811 F.2d 1505 (4th Cir.1987) (text available on Westlaw) (applying Equal Pay Act defenses to Title YII equal pay claims); Branco v. Sargent & Lundy, Case No. 85 C 8845 (N.D.Ill.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Joseph MacHuca Byron
86-7336.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Feb 4, 1987.
811 F.2d 1505
Unpublished

811 F.2d 1505
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Joseph Machuca BYRON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 86-7336.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 26, 1986.
Decided Feb. 4, 1987.

Before WIDENER, HALL and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges.

Joseph Machuca Byron, appellant pro se.

N. George Metcalf, Office of the United States Attorney, for appellee.

PER CURIAM:

1

A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Byron, C/A No. 86-541-R (E.D.Va., October 20, 1986).

2

AFFIRMED.