The State of Texas v. United States of Am. & Interstate Com. Comm'n, Missourt-Kansas-Texas R.R. Co., Missouri Pac. R.R. Co., & S. Pac. Transp. Co., Intervening-Respondents. The State of Texas v. United States of Am. & Interstate Com. Comm'n, Road-Rail Transp. Co., Inc., Intervening-Respondent, 813 F.2d 679 (5th Cir. 1987). · Go Syfert
Search
The State of Texas v. United States of Am. & Interstate Com. Comm'n, Missourt-Kansas-Texas R.R. Co., Missouri Pac. R.R. Co., & S. Pac. Transp. Co., Intervening-Respondents. The State of Texas v. United States of Am. & Interstate Com. Comm'n, Road-Rail Transp. Co., Inc., Intervening-Respondent, 813 F.2d 679 (5th Cir. 1987). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
28 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Bennett v. Genoa Ag Center, Inc. (In Re Bennett) (nynb, 1993-03-17) · Strongest negative: Interocean Ships, Inc. v. Samoa Gases (amsamoa, 1992-12-22)
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987 2006 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" Interocean Ships, Inc. v. Samoa Gases (2×) also: Cited as authority (rule)
amsamoa · 1992 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see In re Incident Aboard D/B Ocean King, 813 F.2d at 686 (sophisticated-user defense applies "only when the user knew of the particular danger").
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Bennett v. Genoa Ag Center, Inc. (In Re Bennett)
Bankr. N.D.N.Y. · 1993 · confidence medium
DISCUSSION Initially, the Court notes that it “ ‘is not bound by the advisory jury’s findings and is free to adopt them in whole or in part or totally disregard them.’ ” Cities Service Co. v. Ocean Drilling and Exploration Co., 813 F.2d 679, 686 (5th Cir.1987) (quoting Cities Service Co. v. Ocean Drilling and Exploration Co., 758 F.2d 1063, 1071 (5th Cir.1985) (citations omitted)).
discussed Cited "see" Jowers v. Lincoln Electric Co.
5th Cir. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Incident Aboard the D/B Ocean King, 813 F.2d 679, 687-89 (5th Cir.1987) (affirming allocation of 55% fault to employer despite rejection of sophisticated user defense), amended on other grounds, 877 F.2d 322 (5th Cir.1989).
discussed Cited "see" Karl Rove & Company v. Richard Thornburgh, Richard Thornburgh, Cross-Appellee, and Raymond P. Dimuzio, Defendant-Cross-Appellee
5th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
Co., No. 01-93-00015-CV, 1994 WL 470355 , at *14 (Tex.Ct.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Aug. 31, 1994); see In re Incident Aboard DIB Ocean King, 813 F.2d 679 , 688-89 (5th Cir.1987), modified on other grounds by 877 F.2d 322 (5th Cir.1989).
discussed Cited "see" Houston Oil & Minerals Corp., Cross-Appellee and Cross v. American International Tool Company, Third Party Cross-Appellant and Cross-Appellee, Gibralter Insurance Company v. Amf Tuboscope, Inc., Cross-Appellee, Pine Top Insurance Company v. Armco, Inc., Marine Drilling Company, Third Party
3rd Cir. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See International Oilfield Divers, Inc. v. Pickle, --- U.S. ----, 107 S.Ct. 939 , 93 L.Ed.2d 989 (1987) (White, J., joined by the Chief Justice, dissenting from denial of certiorari) 4 For example, see our recent decision in In re Incident Aboard D/B Ocean King on 8/30/80, 813 F.2d 679 (5th Cir.1987).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Simeon v. T. Smith & Son, Inc.
5th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see also · confidence medium
We have indeed followed Leger (settlement reduces recovery by proportion of settling party fault) in post-jEd- monds cases, both maritime, e.g., Martin v. Walk, Haydel & Associates, Inc., 742 F.2d 246, 249 (5th Cir.1984); Bass v. Phoenix Seadrill/78, Ltd., 749 F.2d 1154, 1157, 1159 (5th Cir.1985); see also In re Incident Aboard D/B Ocean King, 813 F.2d 679, 689 (5th Cir.1987), and otherwise, e.g., Diggs v. Hood, 772 F.2d 190, 196 (5th Cir.1985) (relying on Leger).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Jules Simeon, Sr., and Ida Mae Griffin Simeon, Wife of Jules Simeon, Sr., Cross-Appellants, Cross-Appellees v. T. Smith & Son, Inc., Cross-Appellant v. Lumar Marine, Inc., Cross-Appellee
5th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see also · confidence medium
We have indeed followed Leger (settlement reduces recovery by proportion of settling party fault) in post-Edmonds cases, both maritime, e.g., Martin v. Walk, Haydel & Associates, Inc., 742 F.2d 246, 249 (5th Cir.1984); Bass v. Phoenix Seadrill/78, Ltd., 749 F.2d 1154, 1157, 1159 (5th Cir.1985); see also In re Incident Aboard D/B Ocean King, 813 F.2d 679, 689 (5th Cir.1987), and otherwise, e.g., Diggs v. Hood, 772 F.2d 190, 196 (5th Cir.1985) (relying on Leger ).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Vivian Marie Self, as Administratrix of the Estate of Danny Joe Self, Deceased, Etc., Cross-Appellant v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Company, a Corporation, Third Party Cross-Appellee, and Chevron Shipping Company, Third Party Cross-Appellant. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Company, a Corporation, Cross v. Chevron Shipping Company, Cross-Appellant, and Italia Societer Per Az Di Nav, Complaint of Chevron Transport Corporation, as Owner of the S/s Robert Watt Miller, in an Action for Exoneration From or Limitation of Liability, Cross-Appellant, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Company, a Corporation, Claimant-Appellant, Cross
3rd Cir. · 1988 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence medium
See, e.g., In re Incident Aboard D/B Ocean King, 813 F.2d 679, 689 (5th Cir.1987); Diggs v. Hood, 772 F.2d 190, 196 (5th Cir.1985).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Self v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co.
11th Cir. · 1987 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence medium
See, e.g., In re Incident Aboard D/B Ocean King, 813 F.2d 679, 689 (5th Cir.1987); Diggs v. Hood, 772 F.2d 190, 196 (5th Cir.1985).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The State of Texas
v.
United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Missourt-Kansas-Texas Railroad Company, Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, and Southern Pacific Transportation Company, Intervening-Respondents. The State of Texas v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Road-Rail Transportation Company, Inc., Intervening-Respondent
84-4169.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Apr 1, 1987.
813 F.2d 679
Published

813 F.2d 679

The STATE OF TEXAS, Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES of America and Interstate Commerce Commission,
Respondents,
Missourt-Kansas-Texas Railroad Company, Missouri Pacific
Railroad Company, and Southern Pacific
Transportation Company, Intervening-Respondents.
The STATE OF TEXAS, Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES of America and Interstate Commerce Commission,
Respondents,
Road-Rail Transportation Company, Inc., Intervening-Respondent.

Nos. 84-4169, 84-4386.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

April 1, 1987.

Justin Scott Wilson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jim Mattox, Atty. Gen., Austin, Tex., for State of Tex.

H. Glenn Scammel, John Broadley, General Counsel, I.C.C., Wm. F. Smith, Atty. Gen., John J. Powers, III, John P. Fonte, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Antitrust Div., Washington, D.C., for respondents.

1

John P. Legendre, Dallas, Tex., Keith G. O'Brien, Washington, D.C., for intervenor-RRTC.

2

Michael E. Roper, Dallas, Tex., for Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. Co.

3

John P. Legendre, Dallas, Tex., for Missouri Pacific R. Co.

4

Hugh L. McCulley, Houston, Tex., for Southern Pacific Transp. Co.

5

On Petition for Review of Interstate Commerce Commission Decision No. 39627.

6

On Petition for Review of Interstate Commerce Commission Decision No. 39704.

7

Before GARZA, POLITZ and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

8

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

PER CURIAM:

9

The Supreme Court, --- U.S. ----, 107 S.Ct. 787, 93 L.Ed.2d 809, having reversed and remanded for further proceedings by this court, it is now ordered that the petitions of the State of Texas for review of orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission are DENIED, at its costs.