People v. Wilson, 2021 NY Slip Op 00579 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021). · Go Syfert
Search
People v. Wilson, 2021 NY Slip Op 00579 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
13 citation events (13 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Real-X Realty, LLC v. Crest Bellport, LLC
N.Y. App. Div. · 2026 · confidence medium
Generally, courts look to the basic elements of the offer and acceptance to determine whether there is an objective meeting of the minds sufficient to give rise to a binding and enforceable contract" ( Petkanas v Petkanas , 191 AD3d 708, 710 [internal quotation marks omitted]).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Chestnut Bay Equestrian, Inc. v. Irrevocable Trust of Jean Pizzirusso
N.Y. App. Div. · 2025 · confidence medium
Generally, courts look to the basic elements of the offer and acceptance to determine whether there is an objective meeting of the minds sufficient to give rise to a binding and enforceable contract'" ( Petkanas v Petkanas , 191 AD3d 708, 710 [internal quotation marks omitted], quoting 1912 Newbridge Rd., LLC v Liantonio , 172 AD3d 962 , 963-964).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Chestnut Bay Equestrian, Inc. v. Irrevocable Trust of Jean Pizzirusso
N.Y. App. Div. · 2025 · confidence medium
Generally, courts look to the basic elements of the offer and acceptance to determine whether there is an objective meeting of the minds sufficient to give rise to a binding and enforceable contract'" ( Petkanas v Petkanas , 191 AD3d 708, 710 [internal quotation marks omitted], quoting 1912 Newbridge Rd., LLC v Liantonio , 172 AD3d 962 , 963-964).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Whyte v. Fresh Meadows Home Improvement Inc.
N.Y. Sup. Queens · 2025 · confidence medium
"In determining whether the parties entered into a contractual agreement and what were its terms, it is necessary to look ... to the objective manifestations of the intent of the parties as gathered by their expressed words and deeds" ( Petkanas v Petkanas , 191 AD3d at 711, quoting Brown Bros.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Rigano v. Uber Tech., Inc.
N.Y. Sup. Ct., Westchester Cty. · 2024 · confidence medium
In Petkanas v Perkanas ( 191 AD3d 708, 710-711 [2d Dept 2021]), the Court instructed: " 'To create a binding contract, there must be a manifestation of mutual assent sufficiently definite to assure that the parties are truly in agreement with respect to all material terms . . . .
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Doyle v. P.A. Sports Authenticator
N.Y. App. Term. · 2022 · confidence medium
While it is true that the fact that an agreement is "not the product of negotiation does not render it unenforceable" ( Molino v Sagamore , 105 AD3d 922, 923 [2013]), mutual assent is an element of binding contracts ( see Petkanas v Petkanas , 191 AD3d 708, 710-711 [2021]; 26th St.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
People
v.
Wilson
Ind. No. 1046/2005.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Feb 3, 2021.
2021 NY Slip Op 00579
Published
People v Wilson (2021 NY Slip Op 00579)
People v Wilson
2021 NY Slip Op 00579
Decided on February 3, 2021
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on February 3, 2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
LEONARD B. AUSTIN
BETSY BARROS
LINDA CHRISTOPHER, JJ.

2007-04189
2010-11993
2011-10470
(Ind. No. 1046/2005)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Shamduh Wilson, appellant.




Shamduh Wilson, Attica, NY, appellant pro se.

Paul Skip Laisure, New York, NY (David P. Greenberg of counsel), former appellate counsel.



DECISION & ORDER

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated July 27, 2016 (People v Wilson, 141 AD3d 737), modifying, inter alia, a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered March 29, 2007.

ORDERED that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277).

DILLON, J.P., AUSTIN, BARROS and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court