United States v. Brown, 818 F.2d 95 (D.C. Cir. 1987). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Brown, 818 F.2d 95 (D.C. Cir. 1987). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1998 · …impaired judgment alone is not enough to toll the statute of limitations. ⚠ not in text
27 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Frances Elaine HOOD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SEARS ROEBUCK AND COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee (ca5, 1999-03-04)
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987 2006 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Frances Elaine HOOD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SEARS ROEBUCK AND COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee
5th Cir. · 1999 · signal: accord · confidence high
Hood urges us to adopt “the traditional rule that mental illness tolls a statute of limitations ... if the illness ... prevents the sufferer from managing his affairs and thus from understanding his legal rights and acting upon them.” Miller v. Runyon, 77 F.3d 189, 191 (7th Cir.1996) (emphasis deleted); accord Speiser v. U.S. Dep’t of Health and Human Servs., 670 F.Supp. 380, 384 (D.D.C.1986), aff'd, 818 F.2d 95 (D.C.Cir.1987).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Brown
86-3044.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
May 27, 1987.
818 F.2d 95
Published

818 F.2d 95

260 U.S.App.D.C. 229

U.S.
v.
Brown

86-3044

United States Court of Appeals,
District of Columbia Circuit.

5/27/87

1

D.C.D.C.

AFFIRMED