G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 2011 ·
…regardless of the fairness of the procedures used to implement them.
at p. 657
⚠ not in text
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
In Re Detention of Morgan
But the McCuistion dissent asserted that a procedural due process analysis applies in SVP challenges where the question involves the adequacy of procedural safeguards and distinguished substantive due process violations as those prohibiting government actions "`regardless of the fairness of the procedures used to implement them.'" 169 Wash.2d at 657, 238 P.3d 1147 (Owens, J., dissenting) (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting In re Pers.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
In re the Detention of Morgan
But the McCuistion dissent asserted that a procedural due process analysis applies in SVP challenges where the question involves the adequacy of procedural safeguards and distinguished substantive due process violations as those prohibiting government actions “ ‘regardless of the fairness of the procedures used to implement them.’ ” 169 Wn.2d at 657 (Owens, J., dissenting) (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting In re Pers.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of the Detention of David W. McCuistion
No. 81644-1.
Washington Supreme Court.
Sep 2, 2010.
169 Wash. 2d 633
Cited by 4 opinions | Published
The opinion in the above captioned case, which appeared in the advance sheets at 169 Wn.2d 633-64, has not been published in this permanent bound volume pursuant to an order of the Supreme Court dated May 10, 2011 directing that the opinion be withdrawn. See_Wn.2d_.