Marriage of Austin v. Di Giacomo, 135 Wash. App. 1014 (Wash. Ct. App. 2006). · Go Syfert
Search
Marriage of Austin v. Di Giacomo, 135 Wash. App. 1014 (Wash. Ct. App. 2006). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases · …did not intend to imply a reading of the burglary statute that would create alternative means of commission based solely on differing intents. ⚠ not in text
8 citation events (8 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" State of Washington v. Christopher Michael Tasker, II
Wash. Ct. App. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Pierce, noted at 135 Wn.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Pierce (2×)
Wash. Ct. App. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Pierce, noted at 135 Wash.App. 1014 , 2006 WL 2924475 at *11-12, review denied, 161 Wash.2d 1016 , 171 P.3d 1056 (2007).
cited Cited "see" State v. Pierce
Wash. Ct. App. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Pierce, noted at 135 Wn.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of the Marriage of Joseph J. Austin
v.
Silvana M. Di Giacomo
No. 57555-4-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington.
Oct 9, 2006.
135 Wash. App. 1014
Published

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 99-3-06917-3, Laura C. Inveen, J., entered December 9, 2005. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.