United States v. John G. Bretz, 829 F.2d 1121 (4th Cir. 1987). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. John G. Bretz, 829 F.2d 1121 (4th Cir. 1987). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, 2013–2014 · …jurisdiction attaches on the initial filing for habeas corpus relief, and it is not destroyed by a transfer of the petitioner and the accompanying custodial change. ⚠ not in text
28 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987 2006 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Oatman v. Lou
W.D. Va. · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
See Sweat v. White, 829 F.2d 1121 (4th Cir. 1987) (per curiam) (noting that jurisdiction attaches on the initial filing for habeas corpus relief and is not destroyed by a transfer of the petitioner and the accompanying custodial change).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Terry v. Stewart
D. Maryland · 2021 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Santillanes v. U.S. Parole Comm'n, 754 F.2d 887, 888 (10th Cir 1985); see also Sweat v. White, 829 F.2d 1121 (4th Cir. 1987) (unpublished table opinion), 1987 WL 44445, at *1 (“It is well-established that jurisdiction attaches on the initial filing for habeas corpus relief, and it is not destroyed by a transfer of the petitioner and the accompanying custodial change” (quoting Santillanes)).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
John G. Bretz
87-7064.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Sep 21, 1987.
829 F.2d 1121
Unpublished

829 F.2d 1121
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
John G. BRETZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 87-7064

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 21, 1987.
Decided September 21, 1987.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert Earl Maxwell, Chief District Judge. (CR 84-38-E)

John G. Bretz, pro se.

David Allen Jividen, Assistant United States Attorney, for appellee.

Before ERVIN, CHAPMAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Bretz, CR No. 84-38-E (N.D.W.Va., Feb. 25, 1987).

2

AFFIRMED.