Said M. Karara v. James P. Jones, Penn, Stuart, Eskridge & Jones, P.A., 833 F.2d 1005 (4th Cir. 1987). · Go Syfert
Search
Said M. Karara v. James P. Jones, Penn, Stuart, Eskridge & Jones, P.A., 833 F.2d 1005 (4th Cir. 1987). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
49 citation events (15 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: KADEL v. FOLWELL (ncmd, 2020-03-11)
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987 2006 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" KADEL v. FOLWELL
M.D.N.C. · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hickey v. Baxter, 833 F.2d 1005 (4th Cir. 1987) (unpublished table decision) (affirming district court’s discretionary stay pending Supreme Court resolution of relevant issues).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Neal v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
W.D.N.C. · 2020 · signal: see also · confidence low
Va. 2013); see also Hickey v. Baxter, 833 F.2d 1005 (4th Cir. 1987) (affirming “district court acted within its discretion in staying proceedings while awaiting guidance from the Supreme Court in a case that could decide relevant issues”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Said M. Karara
v.
James P. Jones, Penn, Stuart, Eskridge & Jones, P.A.
87-2085.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Nov 12, 1987.
833 F.2d 1005
Unpublished

833 F.2d 1005
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Said M. KARARA, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
James P. JONES, Penn, Stuart, Eskridge & Jones, P.A.,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 87-2085.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Aug. 11, 1987.
Decided: Nov. 12, 1987.

Said M. Karara, appellant pro se.

Larry Benson Kirksey, Woodward, Miles & Flannagan, PC, Wade Wallihan Massie, Penn, Stuart, Eskridge & Jones, D. Stan Barnhill, William Beverly Poff, Woods, Rogers & Hazlegrove, for appellees.

Before ERVIN, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from that court's order dismissing Karara's action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Karara v. Jones, C/A No. 86-0239-A (W.D.Va., May 5, 1987).

2

AFFIRMED.