Coe v. Coe, 152 So. 2d 176 (Fla. 3d DCA 1963). · Go Syfert
Search
Coe v. Coe, 152 So. 2d 176 (Fla. 3d DCA 1963). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Shirley COE
v.
Richard COE
No. 62-411.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Apr 23, 1963.
152 So. 2d 176
Ward & Ward, Miami, for appellant., White & Pereno, Miami, for appellee.
Hendry, Horton, Pearson, Tillman.
Published
PER CURIAM.

This appeal by the plaintiff-wife brings up for review the alimony and child support provisions of a final decree in a divorce suit. The appellee has filed a cross-assignment contending that the trial court erred in entering that part of the final decree finding that the parties held certain real estate as an estate by the entireties.

After duly considering the record, we conclude that the appellant has failed to show an abuse of discretion. Lewis v. Lewis, Fla.App.1958, 104 So.2d 597.

We find no merit in appellee’s cross-assignment. McFarland v. McFarland, Fla.App.1961, 131 So.2d 749.

Affirmed.