In re Williams, 109 So. 3d 349 (La. 2013). · Go Syfert
Search
In re Williams, 109 So. 3d 349 (La. 2013). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In re Lenise Rochelle WILLIAMS
No. 2013-B-0417.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Mar 15, 2013.
109 So. 3d 349
Published

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent failed to provide competent representation to a client, neglected a legal matter, and failed to adequately communicate with a client. Following the institution of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

[*350] IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Lenise Rochelle Williams, Louisiana Bar Roll number 29706, be publicly reprimanded.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.