Joseph v. State, 138 So. 3d 601 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014). · Go Syfert
Joseph v. State, 138 So. 3d 601 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Nixon JOSEPH
v.
STATE of Florida
No. 2D13-5704.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
May 9, 2014.
138 So. 3d 601
Crenshaw, Silberman, Wallace.
Published
SILBERMAN, Judge.

We reverse the postconviction court’s order denying Nixon Joseph’s motion filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.801 as untimely filed.

Mr. Joseph’s sentence became final on April 28, 2012, before the enactment of rule 3.801 on July 1, 2013. He filed his motion on September 25, 2013. At the time that Mr. Joseph filed his motion, rule 3.801(b) recited that “[n]o motion shall be filed or considered pursuant to this rule if filed more than 1 year after the sentence becomes final.” When the posteonviction court entered its order on October 15, 2013, the rule had not yet been amended to extend the filing limit for defendants whose sentences became final before July 1, 2013. Defendants in Mr. Joseph’s position, rather than being foreclosed from seeking correction of jail credit, now have until July 1, 2014, to file their motions. See In re Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure and Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, 272 Ala. 517, 132 So.2d 734 (Fla.2013) (“The rule provides a one-year grace period for sentences imposed prior to July 1, 2013.”).

Accordingly, we reverse the order denying Mr. Joseph’s motion and remand for the postconviction court to consider the merits of the motion.

Reversed and remanded.

WALLACE and CRENSHAW, JJ„ Concur.