green
Positive treatment
Issue: legally sufficient claimFL ↗
Issue: facially sufficient claimFL ↗
Issue: Sanchez motionFL ↗
24.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 2015 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2015
2020
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Mejia v. State of Florida
See Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52 , 58–59 (1985); Grosvenor v. State, 874 So. 2d 1176, 1179 (Fla. 2004); Campbell v. State, 139 So. 3d 490, 494 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
White v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Duval County)
Campbell v. State, 139 So. 3d 490, 498 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Belle v. Jones
(2×)
It further acknowledged that, when adjudicating these claims in the context of guilty pleas, a petitioner must show “that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s errors, the movant would not have entered a plea but would have insisted on going to trial.” (Id. at 4 (quoting Campbell v. State, 139 So. 3d 490, 497 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) (citing Hill))).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
LEONARD RICHARD FILIPKOWSKI v. STATE OF FLORIDA
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
Cf. Campbell, 139 So. 3d at 494 (holding that the postconviction court could not rely on the waiver of rights form to refute the defendant's claim that he was not advised of his maximum possible sentence when "the trial court failed to conduct a proper plea colloquy and determine whether [the defendant] understood the form"). -7-
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Harry L. Good v. State
See, e.g., Delice v. State, 103 So.3d 262, 263 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012); Campbell v. State, 139 So.3d 490, 498 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014); Nelson v. State, 996 So.2d 950, 952 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Rohan McDonald v. State of Florida
Campbell v. State, 139 So.3d 490, 494 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014); see also Townsend v. State, 927 So.2d 1064, 1066 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Coursey v. State
However, as noted by this court in Campbell v. State, 139 So.3d 490, 497 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014), “[a]n allegation that trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to file a motion to suppress is a legally sufficient claim, which is not waived by entry of a plea.” (quoting Spencer v. State, 889 So.2d 868, 870 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004)).
cited
Cited "see"
George v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Duval County)
See Campbell v. State, 139 So. 3d 490, 498 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tramel v. Florida Attorney General (Duval County)
(2×)
See Campbell v. State, 139 So. 3d 490, 498 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014).
examined
Cited "see"
JULIO S. CENDEJAS v. STATE OF FLORIDA
(3×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Campbell v. State, 139 So. 3d 490, 494 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) (citing Cousino v. State, 770 So. 2d 1258, 1260 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
STATE OF FLORIDA v. CHRISTOPHER FREDERICKS
See, e.g., Campbell v. State, 139 So. 3d 490, 497-98 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) (counsel’s failure to file motion to suppress search results of defendant’s vehicle was not deficient performance where K-9 alerted on defendant's vehicle, which provided police officers with probable cause to search); Bennett v. State, 111 So. 3d 983, 986 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) (K-9’s “sniff was up to snuff,” and thus trial court did not err in denying motion to suppress based on its determination that police had probable cause to search a vehicle’s trunk); State v. Hill, 770 So. 2d 280, 282 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000) (…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Evan Short v. State
P. 3.850(f)(3); see, e.g., Campbell v. State, 139 So. 3d 490, 495 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sanchez v. State
See Jenkins v. State, 44 So.3d 243, 244 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) (holding that defendant’s acknowledgment during plea colloquy that he was satisfied with counsel’s performance did not refute claim that counsel failed to investigate where defendant’s motion did not state when he learned of counsel’s failure); see also Coursey v. State, 164 So.3d 119, 120 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015) (“[A]n allegation that trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to file a motion to suppress is a legally sufficient claim, which is not waived by entry of a plea.” (quoting Campbell v. State, 139 So.3d …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
YACHTBRASIL MOTOR BOATS & CHARTERS, LLC
v.
John GLUCK
v.
John GLUCK
Nos. 3D14-271, 3D13-1733.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jun 4, 2014.
Richard S. Gendler & Associates and Martin G. McCarthy, for appellant Yacht-Brasil Motor Boats & Charters LLC., Moscowitz & Moscowitz and Norman A. Moscowitz and Jane W. Moscowitz, for appellee.
Salter, Scales, Suarez.
Published
SUAREZ, J.
YachtBrasil Motor Boats & Charters LLC, and Aderbal Coelho, Junior appeal the trial court’s Order Granting Sanctions dated June 5, 2013 striking YachtBrasil’s answers and affirmative defenses and dismissing YachtBrasil’s counterclaim with prejudice. Although these are severe sanctions, we find the trial court did not abuse its discretion and find that each of the elements of Kozel v. Ostendorf, 629 So.2d 817 (Fla.1993) is supported by the evidence.
Affirmed.