G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, 2018–2019 ·
…implicitly concluded that because the surviving spouse can recover from the date of injury, the loss of consortium from the date of injury merges with the continuing injury suffered after death, and the surviving spouse therefore recovers
⚠ not in text
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases ·
…in any action of tort brought against the owner, registrant, operator, or occupant of a motor vehicle with respect to which security has been provided ... a plaintiff may recover damages in tort for pain, suffering, mental anguish, and inconvenience ... only in the event that th…
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 2014 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2014
2020
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Trophia v. Camping World, Inc.
Randall v. Walt Disney World Co., 140 So. 3d 1118, 1120 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014) (quoting ACandS, Inc. v. Redd, 703 So. 2d 492, 494 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Bell v. Miedema
Similarly, Florida state courts have held that “[w]hile spousal consortium claims are derivative in nature, they are nevertheless separate and distinct causes of actions. . . , [and] [a]s separate causes of action, loss of consortium claims must be ‘timely’ in their own right for purposes of the statute of limitations.” Castro v. Linfante, No. 3D19-2136, 2020 WL 4197363 , at *2 (Fla. 3d DCA Jul. 22, 2020) (internal citations omitted); see also Philip Morris USA Inc. v. McCall, 234 So. 3d 4 , 12 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017) (“Loss of consortium claims, while derivative causes of action based o…
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
PHILIP MORRIS USA INC. v. BERNICE MCCALL
Dade Cty. v. 8 Reyes, 688 So. 2d 311, 312 (Fla. 1996); Busby v. Winn & Lovett Miami, Inc., 80 So. 2d 675, 676 (Fla. 1955); Randall v. Walt Disney World Co., 140 So. 3d 1118, 1121 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Villas at Laguna Bay Condo. Ass'n v. CitiMortgage, Inc.
Randall v. Walt Disney World Co., 140 So.3d 1118, 1119 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014) (citing Karimi v. Karimi, 867 So.2d 471, 473 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Engle Cases 4432 Individual Tobacco v. Various Tobacco Companies
Compare ACandS, Inc. v. Redd, 703 So.2d 492, 494-95 (Fla.3d Dist.Ct.App.1997) ("[T]he legislature did not intend for a spouse’s consortium claim to survive an injured spouse’s death from his or her injuries....”), with Randall v. Walt Disney World Co., 140 So.3d 1118, 1121 (Fla.5th Dist.Ct.App.2014)(“[A] loss-of-consortium claim survives the death of a deceased spouse.”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Caesar MARTINEZ, Jr.
v.
STATE of Florida
v.
STATE of Florida
No. 1D14-2515.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Jun 18, 2014.
Caesar Martinez, Jr., pro se, Petitioner., Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Marstiller, Nortwick, Padovano.
Published
PER CURIAM.
DISMISSED. See Baker v. State, 878 So.2d 1236 (Fla.2004).
VAN NORTWICK, PADOVANO, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.