green
Positive treatment
8.9 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
2D17-909 / Morrison v. State
See Huggins v. State, 216 So. 3d 785, 785 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017); Greene v. State, 919 So. 2d 684, 685 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) ("A proper order of revocation will identify the specific conditions of probation violated by the defendant." (citing Greer v. State, 831 So. 2d 1261, 1262 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002))).
discussed
Cited "see"
Morrison v. State
See Huggins v. State, 216 So.3d 785, 785 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017); Greene v. State, 919 So.2d 684, 685 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (“A proper order of revocation will identify the specific conditions of probation violated by the defendant.” (citing Greer v. State, 831 So.2d 1261, 1262 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002))).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cody HUGGINS
v.
STATE of Florida
v.
STATE of Florida
Case No. 2D15-5608.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
May 12, 2017.
Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Matthew D. Bernstein, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant., Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Casanueva, Morris, Northcutt.
Cited by 5 opinions | Published
PER CURIAM.
In this Anders[1] appeal, we affirm Cody Huggins’ judgments and sentences and the revocation of his probation. However, the order of revocation of probation entered on December 4, 2016, does not identify the conditions found to have been violated. We remand solely for entry of a corrected revocation order specifying the condition(s) of probation that Mr. Huggins violated. See Greene v. State, 919 So.2d 684, 686 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (“A proper order of revocation will identify the specific conditions of probation violated by the defendant.”).
Affirmed; remanded with directions.
NORTHCUTT, CASANUEVA, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.1
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).