G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1990 ·
…nude or semi-nude entertainment in any commercial establishment at which alcoholic beverages are, or are available to be, sold, dispensed, consumed, possessed or offered for sale or consumption on the premises
at p. 256
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
2025 Emery Highway, LLC v. Bibb County, Georgia
Geaneas v. Willets, 715 F.Supp. 334, 340 (M.D.Fla.1989) (citing Lanier v. City of Newton, 842 F.2d 253, 256 (11th Cir.1988); Fillingim v. Boone, 835 F.2d 1389, 1399 (11th Cir.1988)).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Heather Gary v. City of Warner Robins
Gary also contends that the City violated the Equal Protection Clause by selectively enforcing the ordinance against her and others employed by Teasers.’ "[T]o state a claim for selective prosecution, [Gary] must demonstrate that [s]he was prosecuted while others similarly situated were not, and furthermore that the government prosecuted h[er] invidiously or in bad faith." Lanier v. City of Newton, 842 F.2d 253, 256 (11th Cir.1988).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
J & B Social Club 1, Inc. v. City of Mobile
See e.g., LaRue, 409 U.S. at 114 , 93 S.Ct. at 395 (“[T]he broad sweep of the Twenty-first Amendment has been recognized as conferring something more than the normal state authority over public health, welfare, and morals.”); Doran v. Salem, 422 U.S. 922, 932 , 95 S.Ct. 2561, 2568 , 45 L.Ed.2d 648 (1975) (“[T]he broad powers of the States to regulate the sale of liquor, conferred by the Twenty-first Amendment, outweighed any First Amendment interest in nude dancing and that a state could therefore ban such dancing as a part of its liquor license program.”) (summarizing LaRue); Bellanca…
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Wreck Bar, Inc. v. Comolli
(3×)
also: Cited "see", Cited "see, e.g."
LaRue, 409 U.S. at 118-19 , 93 S.Ct. at 397 ; Olitsky v. O’Malley, 597 F.2d 295, 300 (1st Cir.1979); Lanier v. Newton, 842 F.2d 253, 255 (11th Cir.1988).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Top Shelf v. Mayor & Aldermen for Savannah
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
See, e.g., LaRue, 409 U.S. at 111-112 , 93 S.Ct. at 393-394 (considering regulation similar to 6-1222(h)(ii)); Iacobucci, 479 U.S. at 93, n. 1 , 107 S.Ct. at 2600, n. 1 ; Bellanca, 452 U.S. at 714, n. 1 , 101 S.Ct. at 2600, n. 1 ; Geneas, 911 F.2d at 580-581, n. 1; Lanier v. City of Newton, 842 F.2d 253, 255, n. 1 ; Fillingim v. Boone, 835 F.2d 1389, 1391, n. 1 (11th Cir.1988). 1.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Geaneas v. Willets
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
In Bellanca, the Supreme Court held that, although nude dancing implicates the first amendment, the states' broad powers under the twenty-first amendment to regulate alcohol outweigh any first amendment interest in nude dancing. 452 U.S. at 717 , 101 S.Ct. at 2601 (quoting Doran v. Salem Inn, Inc., 422 U.S. 922, 932-33 , 95 S.Ct. 2561, 2568 , 45 L.Ed.2d 648 (1975)); see City of Newport, Ky. v. Iacobucci, 479 U.S. 92, 95-96 , 107 S.Ct. 383, 385 , 93 L.Ed.2d 334 (1986); Jorgenson v. County of Volusia, 846 F.2d 1350, 1351 (11th Cir.1988); Lanier v. City of Newton, Ala., 842 F.2d 253, 255 (11th Ci…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Geaneas v. Willets
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
In Bellanca , the Supreme Court held that, although nude dancing implicates the first amendment, the states’ broad powers under the twenty-first amendment to regulate alcohol outweigh any first amendment interest in nude dancing. 452 U.S. at 717 , 101 S.Ct. at 2601 (quoting Doran v. Salem Inn, Inc., 422 U.S. 922, 932-33 , 95 S.Ct. 2561, 2568 , 45 L.Ed.2d 648 (1975)); see City of Newport, Ky. v. Iacobucci, 479 U.S. 92, 95-96 , 107 S.Ct. 383, 385 , 93 L.Ed.2d 334 (1986); Jorgenson v. County of Volusia, 846 F.2d 1350, 1351 (11th Cir.1988); Lanier v. City of Newton, Ala., 842 F.2d 253, 255 (11th…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Walker v. City of Kansas City
See Bellanca, 452 U.S. at 718 , 101 S.Ct. at 2601-02 (city chooses to avoid disturbances associated with mixing alcohol and nude entertainment); LaRue, 409 U.S. at 111 , 93 S.Ct. at 393 (evidence established incidents of prostitution, rape, and assault occurring in or near bars offering nude entertainment); Lanier, 842 F.2d at 255 (town council found nudity and alcohol led to undesirable behavior).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Joe E. Walker, Jr., D/B/A Last Chance Lounge v. City of Kansas City, Missouri Richard L. Berkley, Mayor of Kansas City, Missouri the City Council of Kansas City, Missouri Chuck Weber Sally Johnson Frank Palermo Robert M. Hernandez Joanne M. Collins Charles A. Hazley Dan Cofran Katheryn Shields Emanuel Cleaver Mark Bryant John A. Sharp, Joe E. Walker, Jr., D/B/A Last Chance Lounge v. City of Kansas City, Missouri Richard L. Berkley, Mayor of Kansas City, Missouri the City Council of Kansas City, Missouri Chuck Weber Sally Johnson Frank Palermo Robert M. Hernandez Joanne M. Collins Charles A. Hazley Dan Cofran Katheryn Shields Emanuel Cleaver Mark Bryant John A. Sharp
See Bellanca, 452 U.S. at 718 , 101 S.Ct. at 2601-02 (city chooses to avoid disturbances associated with mixing alcohol and nude entertainment); LaRue, 409 U.S. at 111 , 93 S.Ct. at 393 (evidence established incidents of prostitution, rape, and assault occurring in or near bars offering nude entertainment); Lanier, 842 F.2d at 255 (town council found nudity and alcohol led to undesirable behavior).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Geaneas v. Willets
Fillingim v. Boone, 835 F.2d 1389, 1399 (11th Cir.1988); Lanier v. City of Newton, 842 F.2d 253, 256 (11th Cir.1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wilbesan Charter Sch. v. School Bd. of Hillsborough County
(2×)
See Lanier v. City of Newton, Ala., 842 F.2d 253, 256 (11th Cir.1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Sammy's of Mobile, Ltd. v. City of Mobile
See Lanier v. City of Newton, 842 F.2d 253 (11th Cir.1988) (see appendix, answer to certified question).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
46 Fair empl.prac.cas. 762, 46 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 37,904 Edward S. Furr, Lynden E. Petersen, Daniel F. O'COnnell and James W. Hunt, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants, Jon A. Easter, Lee W. Fowler and Marvin C. Brown
v.
At & T Technologies, Inc., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee
v.
At & T Technologies, Inc., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee
85-1998.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.
Mar 31, 1988.
842 F.2d 253
Published
46 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 762,
46 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 37,904
Edward S. FURR, Plaintiff-Appellee,
Lynden E. Petersen, Daniel F. O'Connell and James W. Hunt,
Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants,
Jon A. Easter, Lee W. Fowler and Marvin C. Brown,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
AT & T TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee.
Nos. 85-1998, 85-2008.
United States Court of Appeals,
Tenth Circuit.
March 31, 1988.
OPINION ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
Before LOGAN and MOORE, Circuit Judges, and BROWN, District Judge.[*]
LOGAN, Circuit Judge.
1
The panel acknowledges error in its reference to the Conover report; it did not realize that exhibit was withdrawn before the case was submitted to the jury. See Furr v. AT & T Technologies, Inc., 824 F.2d 1537, 1543, 1547 (10th Cir.1987). The judge, of course, was aware of the withdrawal, and the exhibit was not submitted to the jury. In light of that withdrawal, the panel has reviewed the evidence again to determine whether it is sufficient to support the verdicts. We have concluded that the evidence is sufficient on both liability and the willfulness findings. Much of that evidence is recited in the panel opinion. Therefore, the panel has voted unanimously to deny AT & T Technologies, Inc., petition for rehearing.
*
The Honorable Wesley E. Brown, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Kansas, sitting by designation