James Peaker v. Chairman of Maryland Parole Comm'n, 846 F.2d 73 (4th Cir. 1988). · Go Syfert
Search
James Peaker v. Chairman of Maryland Parole Comm'n, 846 F.2d 73 (4th Cir. 1988). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
34 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Greenley v. Meersman (ilcd, 1993-11-29)
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988 2007 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Greenley v. Meersman
C.D. Ill. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See Keys Jet Ski, Inc. v. Kays, 893 F.2d 1225 (11th Cir.1990) and Complaint of Shaw, 846 F.2d 73 (4th Cir.1988) respectively.
discussed Cited "see" In Re the Complaint of Falkiner
E.D. Va. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See Complaint of Shaw, 846 F.2d 73 (4th Cir. 1988) (reversing district court’s holding that Limitation of Liability Act does not encompass pleasure boats). 3 .
cited Cited "see, e.g." In Re the Complaint of Boca Grande Club, Inc.
M.D. Fla. · 1989 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, Shaw v. Kidder, 846 F.2d 73 (4th Cir.1988); Endsley v. Young, 872 F.2d 176 (6th Cir.1989).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
James Peaker
v.
Chairman of Maryland Parole Commission
87-7754.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Apr 21, 1988.
846 F.2d 73
Unpublished

846 F.2d 73
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
James PEAKER, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
CHAIRMAN OF MARYLAND PAROLE COMMISSION, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 87-7754.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 29, 1988.
Decided April 21, 1988.

James Peaker, appellant pro se.

Before ERVIN, CHAPMAN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that an appeal from its order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 would be without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal, dispense with oral argument, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. James Peaker v. Chairman of Maryland Parole Commission, CA-87-2707-R (D.Md.Oct. 27, 1987).

2

AFFIRMED.