Roche v. State, 89 So. 3d 1142 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012). · Go Syfert
Search
Roche v. State, 89 So. 3d 1142 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
William Gilbert ROCHE, Jr.
v.
The STATE of Florida
No. 3D11-2354.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jun 20, 2012.
89 So. 3d 1142
Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Brian L. Ellison, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant., Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Douglas J. Glaid, Senior Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Emas, Fernandez, Wells.
Published
WELLS, Chief Judge.

Affirmed. See Smith v. State, 79 So.3d 127 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012); Little v. State, 77 So.3d 722 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011); Adams v. State, 76 So.3d 367 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (holding that section 893.13, as amended by section 893.101, Florida Statutes (2002), is constitutional); see also Flagg v. State, 74 So.3d 138, 141 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) (citing State v. Adkins, 71 So.3d 184 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) [review granted, 71 So.3d 117 (Fla.2011) ], and acknowledging “the uncertainty caused by Shelton v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, 802 F.Supp.2d 1289 (M.D.Fla.2011)]” but reaffirming its view that section 893.13 is constitutional).