United States v. Cleveland Ohio Dailey, 846 F.2d 707 (11th Cir. 1988). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Cleveland Ohio Dailey, 846 F.2d 707 (11th Cir. 1988). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 3 distinct cases · “Newly discovered evidence which goes only to the guilt or innocence of the petitioner is not sufficient to require habeas relief.”
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: United States v. Brian Jerome Lindsey (ca11, 2012-09-25)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Brian Jerome Lindsey
11th Cir. · 2012 · confidence medium
United States v. Dailey, 846 F.2d 707, 708 (11th Cir.1988).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Cleveland Ohio DAILEY, Defendant-Appellant
87-7651.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Jun 8, 1988.
846 F.2d 707
Thomas E. Harrison, Mobile, Ala., for defendant-appellant., J.B. Sessions, III, U.S. Atty., Donna B. Roberts, Asst. U.S. Atty., Mobile, Ala., for plaintiff-appellee.
Kravitch, Johnson, Edmondson.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
1 passages pin-cited by 3 cases
Pinpoint authority: bottom 92%
Citer courts: M.D. Florida (2) · N.D. Florida (1)
PER CURIAM:

[1,2] The robbery of a bankteller at gunpoint is an act of “force and violence” within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. section 2113(a). The evidence in this case is sufficient to support defendant’s convictions pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 2113(a) and 18 U.S.C. sec. 2113(d).

AFFIRMED.