Eric Smith v. Howard N. Lyles, Warden, 861 F.2d 266 (4th Cir. 1988). · Go Syfert
Search
Eric Smith v. Howard N. Lyles, Warden, 861 F.2d 266 (4th Cir. 1988). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
44 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Douglas Floyd Osborne, Jr. (ca4, 1991-08-12)
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988 2007 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" United States v. Douglas Floyd Osborne, Jr.
4th Cir. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Flippen, No. 88-5041, slip op. at 5 (4th Cir. Sept. 26, 1988) [ 861 F.2d 266 (table) ]; see also United States v. Stanley, 896 F.2d 450, 451 (10th Cir.1990).
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Enstice
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1990 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Flippen, 674 F. Supp. 536, 539 (E.D.Va. 1987), aff'd, 861 F.2d 266 (4th Cir.1988).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Eric Smith
v.
Howard N. Lyles, Warden
88-6549.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Sep 22, 1988.
861 F.2d 266
Unpublished

861 F.2d 266
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Eric SMITH, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Howard N. LYLES, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 88-6549.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 22, 1988.
Decided Sept. 22, 1988.

Eric Smith, appellant pro se.

Richard Bruce Rosenblatt, Office of Attorney General of Maryland, for appellee.

Before JAMES DICKSON PHILLIPS, SPROUSE, and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Eric Smith appeals from the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Smith v. Lyles, CA-86-682-HAR (D.Md. Jan. 28, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively.

2

AFFIRMED.