In re Scanlon, 886 A.2d 682 (Pa. 2005). · Go Syfert
Search
In re Scanlon, 886 A.2d 682 (Pa. 2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 4× by 1 distinct case · …at first glance, it appears that the commonwealth is appealing a verdict of acquittal, which is clearly impermissible. at p. 686 ⚠ not in text
cited 4× by 1 distinct case · …court had no authority to dismiss the deadlocked verdict on third degree murder once it was recorded and the jury dismissed. ⚠ not in text
42 citation events (42 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Treatment trajectory · 2014 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2014 2020 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (rule) Audrey McDaniels v. Warden Cambridge Springs SCI (4×)
3rd Cir. · 2017 · confidence medium
The Pennsylvania Superior Court began its analysis of the appeal by stating: “At first glance, it appears that the Commonwealth is appealing a verdict of acquittal, which is clearly impermissible.” Commonwealth v. McDaniels, 886 A.2d 682, 686 (Pa. Super.
cited Cited "see" Com. v. Landis, W., Jr.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. McDaniels , 886 A.2d 682 , 686-687 (Pa.Super. 2005) (stating, "[i]t cannot be disputed that a jury's recorded verdict is inviolate.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Commonwealth v. Fudge
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2019 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g. , Commonwealth v. McDaniels , 886 A.2d 682 , 688 (Pa. Super. 2005) (rejecting the trial court's efforts to mold a verdict, noting that "a hung jury was a plausible enough result").
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of James J. SCANLON
No. 114 DB 2005 (No. 49 RST 2005).
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Nov 29, 2005.
886 A.2d 682
Published

ORDER

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT FROM INACTIVE STATUS

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 29th day of November, 2005, the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated October 21, 2005, are approved and it is ORDERED that JAMES J. SCANLON, who has been on inactive status, has never been suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that he has the moral qualifications, competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement shall be paid by the Petitioner.