green
Positive treatment
13.9 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
HEAGY v. BURLINGTON STORES, INC.
Exch., 50 A.3d 1256, 1261 (Pa. 2012) (quoting Powell v. Drumheller, 653 A.2d 619, 624 (Pa. 1995)). 24 KBS’ Mot.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Ramsey v. Buchanan Auto Park, Inc.
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
Exch., 50 A.3d 1256, 1259, 1260-61 (Pa. 2012) (quoting Von der Heide v. Commonwealth, Dep’t of Transp., 718 A.2d 286 , 288 6 Because we find that Ramsey’s claim would fail under Rule 56 scrutiny even if expert testimony were unnecessary, we need not address Judge Carlson’s analysis on that subject.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Stevens, J. v. Shambach, C.
First, “[d]eterminations of superseding cause are normally made by the fact-finder.” Bole v. Erie Insurance Exchange, 50 A.3d 1256, 1261 (Pa. 2012).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Abdel FATTAH
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, State Correctional Institute at Rockview, John E. Wetzel and Marirosa Lamas
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, State Correctional Institute at Rockview, John E. Wetzel and Marirosa Lamas
Abdel Fattah, pro se., Timothy Adres Holmes, Esq., PA Department of Corrections, Mechanicsburg, for Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al.
Published
ORDER
PER CURIAM.AND NOW, this 20th day of August, 2012, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is AFFIRMED.