green
Positive treatment
7.2 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Com. v. Whitcomb, H.
Thus, only when the words of a statute are ambiguous, should a reviewing court seek to ascertain the intent of the General Assembly through considerations of the various factors found in Section 1921(c).[4] Id. (some citations omitted). ____________________________________________ 4 Section 1921(c) states: (c) When the words of the statute are not explicit, the intention of the General Assembly may be ascertained by considering, among other matters: (1) The occasion and necessity for the statute. (2) The circumstances under which it was enacted. (3) The mischief to be remedied. (4) The object …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
CITY OF RIVERSIDE, Objector
v.
RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY in Liquidation (Ancillary Matter to In re Reliance Insurance Company in Liquidation, No. 1 REL 2001). Appeal of City of Riverside, Objector
v.
RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY in Liquidation (Ancillary Matter to In re Reliance Insurance Company in Liquidation, No. 1 REL 2001). Appeal of City of Riverside, Objector
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Mar 12, 2014.
Published
ORDER
PER CURIAM.AND NOW, this 12th day of March, 2014, the order of the Commonwealth Court is AFFIRMED.