G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, 2023–2026 ·
…when a contract governed by delaware law calls upon a party to act or make a determination in good faith, without any qualifier, it means that the party must act in subjective good faith.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 2019 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2019
2022
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Chavez T. Williams v. Cynthia H. Hall
(2×)
Therefore, we address these arguments together. 33 Levey v. Brownstone Asset Mgmt., LP, 76 A.3d 764, 768 (Del. 2013) (“This Court reviews the interpretation and application of legal precepts, such as the statute of limitations and the doctrine of laches, de novo.”). 34 CDX Holdings, Inc. v. Fox, 141 A.3d 1037, 1041 (Del. 2016). 35 Id. 36 Fike v. Ruger, 752 A.2d 112, 113 (Del. 2000) (citation omitted). 37 Id. 6 prejudice are questions of fact that depend upon the totality of circumstances.”38 Here, Appellants did not show that they suffered prejudice and therefore could not assert laches …
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Richardson v. Reed
“When factual findings are based on determinations regarding the credibility of witnesses, the deference already required by the clearly erroneous standard of appellate review is enhanced.” CDX Holdings, Inc. v. Fox, 141 A.3d 1037, 1041 (Del. 2016). 7 “overwhelming” “during the summer and fall[.]”25 Here, the evidence was not overwhelming.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
In re Columbia Pipeline Group, Inc. Merger Litigation
Nov. 15, 2023) (“In Delaware, prejudgment interest is awarded as a matter of right and computed from the day payment is due.”). 163 Brandywine Smyrna, 34 A.3d at 486 . 164 See, e.g., CDX Hldgs., Inc. v. Fox, 141 A.3d 1037, 1040, 1042 (Del. 2016) (affirming award of pre- and post-judgment interest at legal rate compounding quarterly from closing through payment); RBC, 129 A.3d at 869 (same). 165 See Energy Transfer, LP v. Williams Cos., Inc., --- A.3d ---, --- 2023 WL 6561767 , at *22 (Del.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Deputy v. Deputy
Feb. 1, 2021). 6 See CDX Holdings, Inc. v. Fox, 141 A.3d 1037, 1041 (Del. 2016) (“After a trial, findings of historical fact are subject to the deferential ‘clearly erroneous’ standard of review.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Coleman
The PDWBPP charge was severed prior to trial. 31 See Coleman, 2016 WL 3387192, at *3 (detailing the overwhelming State’s evidence supporting Defendant’s conviction.). 32 D.I. 63. 33 See Sentencing Calendar: Defendant Sentenced, D.I. 79; see also Sentence: ASOP Order Signed & Filed on 03/03/15. 34 See Coleman, 2016 WL 3387192 . 35 D.I. 94. 36 D.I. 108. 5 23, 2017.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Backer v. Palisades Growth Capital
Co. v. Dobler, 880 A.2d 206, 219 (Del. 2005)). 102 Biolase, Inc. v. Oracle P’rs, 97 A.3d 1029, 1035 (Del. 2014) (quoting Schock v. Nash, 732 A.2d 217, 224 (Del. 1999)). 103 Cede & Co. v. Technicolor, Inc., 758 A.2d 485, 491 (Del. 2000). 104 CDX Hldgs., Inc. v. Fox, 141 A.3d 1037, 1041 (Del. 2016). 105 RBC Cap.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Carlos Eduardo Lorefice Lynch v. R. Angel Gonzalex Gonzalex
When factual findings are based on determinations regarding the credibility of witnesses, the deference already required by the clearly erroneous standard of appellate review is enhanced.” (quoting CDX Hldgs., Inc. v. Fox, 141 A.3d 1037, 1041 (Del. 2016))). 10 that Belleville is a named plaintiff, and contends that giving Gonzalez, a defendant, control of Belleville would deprive Belleville of its right to appeal this Court’s decision.
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Coleman
(3×)
State, 2016 WL 3387192, *1 (Del. 2016). 8 Coleman v. State, 2019 WL 1780795 , *1-2 (Del.Super. 2019).
cited
Cited "see"
Bandera Master Fund LP v. Boardwalk Pipeline Partners, LP
See CDX Hldgs., Inc. v. Fox, 141 A.3d 1037 (Del. 2016).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Dell Technologies Inc. Class V Stockholders Litigation
See id. at 1042 (Valihura, J., dissenting). 9 Boardwalk Pipeline P’rs, LP v. Bandera Master Fund LP, 288 A.3d 1083 (Del. 2022) (reversing post-trial judgment of $690 million for plaintiff class of limited partner investors); Dell, Inc. v. Magnetar Glob.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Darrell COLEMAN, Below-Appellant
v.
STATE of Delaware, Below-Appellee
v.
STATE of Delaware, Below-Appellee
No. 120, 2015.
Supreme Court of Delaware.
Jun 3, 2016.
Cited by 4 opinions | Published
Court Below: Superior Court of the State of Delaware, ID No.. 1305011774A.
AFFIRMED.