Treatment trajectory · 2017 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2017
2021
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Norman v. State
C. § 464(a). 11 Id. § 464(b). 12 Lewis v. State, 144 A.3d 1109, 1117 (Del. 2016). 6 (13) The jury may consider a defense only if the court is satisfied that there is credible evidence supporting each element of the defense.13 A defendant has presented evidence sufficient to satisfy the credible evidence threshold if the defendant’s version of events, if taken as true, would entitle the defendant to the requested instruction.14 (14) The Superior Court correctly concluded that the evidence did not satisfy that standard in this case.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Luis Clark v. Superintendent Retreat SCI
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
In an analogous case, the Supreme Court of Delaware held that a self-defense instruction was unavailable as a matter of law for a person charged with a similar crime of “possession of a firearm by a person prohibited—negligently causing death.” Lewis v. State, 144 A.3d 1109, 1117 (Del. 2016).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Hubbard v. State
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
The “common law rule [is] that, absent a saving statute, the repeal of a criminal statute voids all prosecutions under it that have not attained final judgments.”1 In this case, however, the appellant’s carjacking conviction was final well before the General Assembly repealed the 1 Lewis v. State, 144 A.3d 1109, 1113 (Del. 2016).
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Lewis
(7×)
The General Assembly re-enacted §1448(€)(2) on January 30, 2014, noting that it had been mistakenly repealed.48 On direct appeal, Lewis argued that the Superior Court should have dismissed the §1448(e)(2) charge in the December 2013 re-indictment because §1448(e)(2) was 43Lewis v. State, 144 A.3d 1 109 (Del. 2016). 44 Superior Court Criminal Rule 61(i)(4). 45 Superior Court Docket No. 2- June 24, 2013 Indictment. 46 Superior Court Docket No. 23- December 23, 2013 Re-Indictment 47 Lewis v. State, 144 A.3d 1109, 1112 (Del. 2016). 48 Lewis v. State, 144 A.3d 1109, 1112 (Del. 2016). repealed …
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Butcher v. State
(3×)
also: Cited "see"
Id. (citing Lewis v. State, 144 A.3d 1109, 1111 (Del. 2016) (en banc); United States v. Smith, 632 F.3d 1043, 1047-49 (8th Cir. 2011)). 30 .
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Miller v. State
Seitz, Jr. Justice 22 Lewis v. State, 144 A.3d 1109, 1118 (Del. 2016) (internal citation omitted). 12
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Miller v. State
Seitz, Jr. Justice 22 Lewis v. State, 144 A.3d 1109, 1118 (Del. 2016) (internal citation omitted). 12
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Carter
Thereafter, during closing argument, the State told the jury that the element of being a person prohibited was stipulated to without any further comment that might invite jury speculation.47 For the foregoing reasons, Defendant has not demonstrated that he was prejudiced by the joinder, and therefore, Defendant’s ineffective assistance claim on this ground fails.48 Ground Two In his second ground for relief, Defendant asserts that trial counsel provided ineffective assistance when trial counsel did not file a motion in limine to exclude: (1) the entirety of the 911 call made by the child; an…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Franklin ANDERSON, Below
v.
STATE of Delaware, Below
v.
STATE of Delaware, Below
No. 105, 2016.
Supreme Court of Delaware.
Jul 22, 2016.
Published
Court Below — Superior Court of the State of Delaware, Cr. ID No. 1411004241.
DISMISSED.