discussed Cited "see, e.g." Tincher, T. v. Omega Flex Inc. See Tincher , 104 A.3d at 335 , 380-81 , 407-08 ; see also High v. Pennsy Supply, Inc. , 154 A.3d 341 , 347 (Pa. Super. 2017) ("the Tincher Court concluded that the question of whether a product is in a defective condition unreasonably dangerous to the consumer is a question of fact that should generally be reserved for the factfinder"), petition for allowance of appeal denied , No. 211 MAL 2017, 171 A.3d 1287 (Pa., Sept. 26, 2017).