Nadim Daher v. Ins. Crime Prevention Inst., 865 F.2d 257 (6th Cir. 1988). · Go Syfert
Search
Nadim Daher v. Ins. Crime Prevention Inst., 865 F.2d 257 (6th Cir. 1988). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, 2024–2025 · …he federal rules make only one reference to a motion to strike in rule 12(f). this rule relates only to pleadings and is inapplicable to other filings. ⚠ not in text
58 citation events (22 in the last 25 years) across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Greer v. Harreld (ohsd, 2025-01-03)
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988 2007 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Greer v. Harreld
S.D. Ohio · 2025 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
he federal rules make only one reference to a motion to strike in rule 12(f). this rule relates only to pleadings and is inapplicable to other filings.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Napier v. American Economy Insurance Company
S.D. Ohio · 2024 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
he federal rules make only one reference to a motion to strike in rule 12(f). this rule relates only to pleadings and is inapplicable to other filings.
discussed Cited "see" Dennis Lee Maxberry v. Securities and Exchange Commission
6th Cir. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See Exquisite Star Tours Equity, Inc. by Maxberry v. Department of Treasury, IRS, 865 F.2d 257 (Table) (No. 88-4001) (1988); Maxberry v. McDonald’s Corp., 815 F.2d 704 (Table) (No. 87-3020) (1987); Maxberry v. United States Army Review Bd., 815 F.2d 704 (Table) (No. 87-3019) (1987).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Nadim Daher
v.
Insurance Crime Prevention Institute
88-3261.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Dec 12, 1988.
865 F.2d 257
Unpublished
1 passages pin-cited by 2 cases
Pinpoint authority: #46,669 of 633,719
Citer courts: S.D. Ohio (2)

865 F.2d 257

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Nadim DAHER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
INSURANCE CRIME PREVENTION INSTITUTE, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 88-3261.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Dec. 12, 1988.

Before KRUPANSKY and RYAN, Circuit Judges, and JOHN W. PECK, Senior Circuit Judge.

ORDER

1

This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof,

2

The Court finds that no prejudicial error intervened in the judgment and proceedings in the district court, and it is therefore ORDERED that said judgment be, and it hereby is, AFFIRMED.