neutral
Cited (no substantive treatment)
0.2 score
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Betty BENDALL, Claimant-Appellant,
v.
A.H. ROBINS COMPANY, INCORPORATED, Debtor-Appellee, v. DALKON SHIELD CLAIMANTS’ COMMITTEE, Amicus Curiae
v.
A.H. ROBINS COMPANY, INCORPORATED, Debtor-Appellee, v. DALKON SHIELD CLAIMANTS’ COMMITTEE, Amicus Curiae
88-1571.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Mar 22, 1989.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Upon consideration of appellant’s pro se letter, which this Court has construed as a motion for reconsideration of the order denying the petition for rehearing,
IT IS ORDERED that appellant’s motion for reconsideration is granted, and the petition for rehearing in this case is granted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond, is hereby reversed.
Entered at the direction of Judge Russell, with the concurrence of Judge Widener and Judge Chapman.