Hulsey (Daniel P.) v. Usair, Inc, 875 F.2d 858 (5th Cir. 1989). · Go Syfert
Hulsey (Daniel P.) v. Usair, Inc, 875 F.2d 858 (5th Cir. 1989). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
17 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Hollon v. Oy (txed, 1995-09-29)
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Hollon v. Oy
E.D. Tex. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hensgens v. Deere & Co., 883 F.2d 1179 (5th Cir.1987), appeal after remand, 869 F.2d 879 , reh’g denied, 875 F.2d 858 , cert. denied, 493 U.S. 851 , 110 S.Ct. 150 , 107 L.Ed.2d 108 (1989). 1 In Hensgens, the court discussed the competing interests that are affected when a plaintiff seeks to add a nondiverse defendant to an already-removed case.
discussed Cited "see" In Re Norplant Contraceptive Prod. Liability
E.D. Tex. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hensgens v. Deere & Co., 833 F.2d 1179 (5th Cir.1987), appeal after remand, 869 F.2d 879 , reh'g denied, 875 F.2d 858 , cert. denied, 493 U.S. 851 , 110 S.Ct. 150 , 107 L.Ed.2d 108 (1989). [1] In Hensgens, the court discussed the competing interests that are affected when a plaintiff seeks to add a nondiverse defendant to an already-removed case.
discussed Cited "see" Selman v. Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories
E.D. Tex. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hensgens v. Deere & Co., 833 F.2d 1179 (5th Cir.1987), appeal after remand, 869 F.2d 879 , reh’g denied, 875 F.2d 858 , cert. denied, 493 U.S. 851 , 110 S.Ct. 150 , 107 L.Ed.2d 108 (1989). 1 In Hensgens, the court discussed the competing interests which are affected when a plaintiff seeks to add a nondiverse defendant to an already-removed case and stated that “the district court, when confronted with an amendment to add a nondiverse nonindispensable party, should use its discretion in deciding whether to allow that party to be added.” Id. at 1182.
discussed Cited "see" In Re Norplant Contracep. Prods. Liability Lit.
E.D. Tex. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hensgens v. Deere & Co., 833 F.2d 1179 (5th Cir.1987), appeal after remand, 869 F.2d 879 , reh'g denied, 875 F.2d 858 , cert. denied, 493 U.S. 851 , 110 S.Ct. 150 , 107 L.Ed.2d 108 (1989). [1] In Hensgens, the court discussed the competing interests which are affected when a plaintiff seeks to add a nondiverse defendant to an already-removed case and stated that "the district court, when confronted with an amendment to add a nondiverse nonindispensable party, should use its discretion in deciding whether to allow that party to be added." Id. at 1182.
discussed Cited "see" Le Duc v. Bujake (2×)
E.D. Mo. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See Id.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Deutsche Shell Tanker-Gesellschaft mbH v. Placid Refining Co.
E.D. La. · 1991 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Lloyd’s Leasing Ltd. v. Conoco, 868 F.2d 1447 (5th Cir.) (oilspill property damage suffered about 70 miles from the offending vessel was not reasonably forseeable), reh’g en banc denied mem., 875 F.2d 858 (5th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hulsey (Daniel P.)
v.
Usair, Inc
87-1886.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
May 12, 1989.
875 F.2d 858
Published

875 F.2d 858

Hulsey (Daniel P.)
v.
USAir, Inc.

NO. 87-1886

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

MAY 12, 1989

N.D.Tex., 868 F.2d 1423

1

DENIALS OF REHEARING EN BANC.