United States v. Wayne Young, 875 F.2d 868 (6th Cir. 1989). · Go Syfert
United States v. Wayne Young, 875 F.2d 868 (6th Cir. 1989). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
77 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 19 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Elbert L. Hatchett (ca6, 1990-11-07)
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989 2007 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Elbert L. Hatchett (2×)
6th Cir. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Var-Ken, Inc., 875 F.2d 868 (6th Cir.1989) (unpublished per curiam) (reversing a summary judgment against the government in an action to enforce a levy and foreclose on funds assertedly owned by Hatchett). 9 Throughout 1985, Hatchett made several payments toward his tax debt totalling $80,000.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Industrial Indemnity Insurance v. Crown Auto Dealerships, Inc.
M.D. Fla. · 1990 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See e.g., United States Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Co. v. Murray Ohio Manufacturing Co., 693 F.Supp. 617 (M.D.Tenn.1988), aff'd 875 F.2d 868 (6th Cir.1989); United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Korman Corp., 693 F.Supp. 253 (E.D.Pa.1988); Waste Management of Carolinas, Inc. v. Peerless Insurance Co., 315 N.C. 688 , 340 S.E.2d 374 (1986).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Ray Industries, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance
E.D. Mich. · 1989 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., U.S. Fidelity and Guaranty Co. v. Murray Ohio Mfg., 693 F.Supp. 617, 622 (M.D.Tenn.1988) aff'd 875 F.2d 868 (6th Cir.1989) (“Simply put, an event that occurs over the course of six years logically cannot be said to be ‘sudden.’ ”); Detrex Chemical Industries v. Employers Insurance of Wausau, 681 F.Supp. 438, 457 (N.D.Ohio 1987) (“Sudden and accidental” does not include injuries incurred over a period of time.); Centennial Insurance Co. v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co., 677 F.Supp. 342, 349 (E.D.Pa.1987) (The *1319 continuous disposal of pollutants in the regular course …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Wayne Young
87-2002.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
May 18, 1989.
875 F.2d 868
Unpublished

875 F.2d 868

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Wayne YOUNG, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 87-2002.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

May 18, 1989.

Before ALAN E. NORRIS and RYAN, Circuit Judges, and CHARLES M. ALLEN[*], Senior District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

1

Appellant was convicted at a jury trial of the offense of possessing a sawed-off, unregistered shotgun. The shotgun was found in a room which the defendant acknowledged he occupied.

2

The only noteworthy contention of error made by the appellant is that the trial court allowed the admission in evidence of a sweat shirt worn by appellant at the time of his arrest, which bore the legend "9mm. is My Name, Terminator is My Game." Appellant does not challenge the trial court's admission of evidence that the government agents found a 9mm gun at the appellant's residence, or testimony of the appellant's propensity to violence, and his offers to use guns to enforce his wishes. The evidence pertaining to the appellant's threats and violence was introduced through a co-defendant, who was a girlfriend, for the purpose of showing that she had been coerced into making a false exculpatory statement.

3

Appellant argues that the evidence concerning the sweat shirt was improperly admitted under 404(b), and that even if it should have been admitted, that a limiting instruction should have been given. While the trial court did admit the evidence under 404(b), we believe that it was properly admissible under Rule 403. Therefore, there was no need for a limiting instruction.

4

AFFIRMED.

*

The Honorable Charles M. Allen, United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky, sitting by designation