Lewis v. Mudd, 884 S.W.2d 318 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994). · Go Syfert
Search
Lewis v. Mudd, 884 S.W.2d 318 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
12 citation events (9 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) McCulley v. Brooks & Co. General Contractors, Inc.
Va. · 2018 · confidence medium
LEXIS 1223 , at *3-6 (Ky. Ct. App. Apr. 6, 2007); Hill Behan Lumber Co. v. Bankhead, 884 S.W.2d 318, 323 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994); Miller v. Steichen, 682 N.W.2d 702, 707 (Neb. 2004); Sawyer v. Sugarless Shops, Inc., 792 P.2d 14, 17 (Nev. 1990); Irving Tr.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Milbourn v. Milbourn
Mo. Ct. App. · 2008 · confidence medium
Hill Behan Lumber Co. v. Bankhead, 884 S.W.2d 318, 322 (Mo.App.1994).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Bueneman v. Zykan
Mo. Ct. App. · 2001 · confidence medium
Hill Behan Lumber Co. v. Bankhead, 884 S.W.2d 318, 322 (Mo.App.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) State ex rel. Freeway Media, L.L.C. v. City of Kansas City
Mo. Ct. App. · 2000 · confidence medium
Anderson v. Division of Child Support Enforcement, 995 S.W.2d 546, 549 (Mo.App.1999); Earls, 949 S.W.2d at 242-43 ; Carter, 765 S.W.2d at 670 . “[A] default judgment, being void due to lack of jurisdiction, remains void forever and any kind of proceeding to cancel it is proper.” Hill Behan Lumber Co. v. Bankhead, 884 S.W.2d 318, 322 (Mo.App.1994).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Shapiro v. Brown
Mo. Ct. App. · 1998 · confidence medium
Hill Behan Lumber Co. v. Bankhead, 884 S.W.2d 318, 322 (Mo.App.1994).
discussed Cited "see" Karen Coburn v. Kramer & Frank, P.C.
Mo. Ct. App. · 2021 · signal: accord · confidence high
See, e.g., In re Dunn, 181 S.W.3d 601, 604 (Mo. App. E.D. 2006); McNeil-Terry v. Roling, 142 S.W.3d 828, 832 (Mo. App. E.D. 2004). 12 Crouch v. Crouch, 641 S.W.2d 86, 90 (Mo. banc 1982)) (bracketed material in original); accord Hirst v. Cramer, 195 S.W.2d 738 , 740 (Mo. banc 1946). “[A] default judgment, being void due to lack of jurisdiction, remains void forever and any kind of proceeding to cancel it is proper.” Hill Behan Lumber Co. v. Bankhead, 884 S.W.2d 318, 322 (Mo. App. E.D. 1994) (citing Gerding v. Hawes Firearms Co., 698 S.W.2d 605, 607 (Mo. App. E.D. 1985)).
cited Cited "see" Russ v. Russ
Mo. Ct. App. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally Hill Behan Lumber Co. v. Bankhead, 884 S.W.2d 318, 322 (Mo.App.1994).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Anthony LEWIS
v.
Paul MUDD
No. WD 48865.
Missouri Court of Appeals.
Aug 16, 1994.
884 S.W.2d 318
Anthony Lewis, pro se., Paul Mudd, pro se.
Berrey, Ellis, Smart.
Published

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the trial court’s order dismissing his action for failure to state a claim.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).