Smith v. Am. Fam. Life Ins., 984 S.W.2d 560 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999). · Go Syfert
Search
Smith v. Am. Fam. Life Ins., 984 S.W.2d 560 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
7 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) Ford Motor Co. v. City of Hazelwood
Mo. Ct. App. · 2005 · confidence medium
Toghiyany v. City of Berkeley, 984 S.W.2d 560, 563 (Mo.App.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Brady v. Pace (2×)
Mo. Ct. App. · 2003 · confidence medium
Begshaw v. City of Independence, 41 S.W.3d 500, 504 [7] (Mo.App.2000) (citing Toghiyany v. City of Berkeley, 984 S.W.2d 560, 563 (Mo.App.1999)).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Golden Rule Insurance Co. v. Missouri Department of Insurance
Mo. Ct. App. · 2001 · confidence medium
The issue of the exhaustion of remedies is “one of subject matter jurisdiction.” Toghiyany v. City of Berkeley, 984 S.W.2d 560, 563 (Mo.App.1999).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Begshaw v. City of Independence
Mo. Ct. App. · 2000 · confidence medium
“The proceedings of a trial court without subject matter jurisdiction are void and the only recourse is to dismiss the cause.” Toghiyany v. City of Berkeley, 984 S.W.2d 560, 563 (Mo. App. E.D.1999).
cited Cited "see" Brazilia, L.L.C. v. Collector of St. Louis County
Mo. Ct. App. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally Toghiyany v. City of Berkeley, 984 S.W.2d 560, 563 (Mo.App.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ernestine SMITH
v.
AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE INSURANCE, Defendants/Respondents
No. 74354.
Missouri Court of Appeals.
Jan 19, 1999.
984 S.W.2d 560
Coggan R. Mills, Nancy W. Mills, St. Louis, for appellant., Kimberly A. Maschmeyer, St. Louis, for respondent.
Crahañ, Dowd, Teitelman.
Published

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is an action to recover proceeds under a life insurance policy allegedly issued to Appellant Ernestine Smith’s deceased husband. Appellant appeals the grant of summary judgment in favor of Respondents, American Family Life Insurance and Gary Henderson, an agent of American Family Life Insurance.

We have reviewed the briefs and the record. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).*

Respondents' joint motion to strike Appellant’s brief or alternatively to dismiss Appellant’s appeal, which was taken with the case, is denied.