Jeetendra BHANDARI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FIRST Nat'l BANK OF Com., Defendant-Appellee, 887 F.2d 609 (1st Cir. 1989). · Go Syfert
Search
Jeetendra BHANDARI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FIRST Nat'l BANK OF Com., Defendant-Appellee, 887 F.2d 609 (1st Cir. 1989). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
26 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 13 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Nagy v. Baltimore Life Insurance (mdd, 1999-05-24) · Strongest negative: Anderson v. Conboy (ca2, 1998-09-10)
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990 2008 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited "but see" Anderson v. Conboy (3×) also: Cited "see", Cited "see, e.g."
2d Cir. · 1998 · signal: but cf. · confidence high
But cf. Bhandari v. First Nat'l Bank of Commerce, 829 F.2d 1343 (5th Cir.1987) (en banc) (7-6 decision overruling Guerra on other grounds), vacated, 492 U.S. 901 , 109 S.Ct. 3207 , 106 L.Ed.2d 558 (1989), reinstated on remand, 887 F.2d 609 (5th Cir.1989) (per curiam).
examined Cited "but see" 77 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 1278, 74 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 45,552 Linden D. Anderson v. Kenneth Conboy, Investigations and Review Officer, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Sigurd Lucassen, General President, District Council of New York City and Vicinity, Frederick W. Devine, and Local 17 (3×) also: Cited "see", Cited "see, e.g."
2d Cir. · 1998 · signal: but cf. · confidence high
But cf. Bhandari v. First Nat'l Bank of Commerce, 829 F.2d 1343 (5th Cir.1987) (en banc) (7-6 decision overruling Guerra on other grounds), vacated, 492 U.S. 901 , 109 S.Ct. 3207 , 106 L.Ed.2d 558 (1989), reinstated on remand, 887 F.2d 609 (5th Cir.1989) (per curiam).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Nagy v. Baltimore Life Insurance
D. Maryland · 1999 · confidence medium
Subsequently, the Fourth Circuit, disagreeing with the Fifth Circuit, see Bhandari v. First Nat’l Bank of Commerce, 829 F.2d 1343 (5th Cir.1987) (en banc), remanded, 492 U.S. 901 , 109 S.Ct. 3207 , 106 L.Ed.2d 558 (1989), aff'd on remand, 887 F.2d 609, 610 (5th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1061 , 110 S.Ct. 1539 , 108 L.Ed.2d 778 (1990), interpreted § 1981 as outlawing private discrimination against aliens.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Duane v. GEICO
4th Cir. · 1994 · confidence medium
Bhandari v. First Nat’l Bank of Commerce, 887 F.2d 609, 610 (5th Cir.1989).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Duane v. Geico
4th Cir. · 1994 · confidence medium
Bhandari v. First Nat'l Bank of Commerce, 887 F.2d 609, 610 (5th Cir.1989).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Duane v. Government Employees Insurance
D. Maryland · 1992 · confidence medium
Bhandari v. First National Bank of Commerce, 887 F.2d 609, 610 (5th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1061 , 110 S.Ct. 1539 , 108 L.Ed.2d 778 (1990). 7 .
discussed Cited "see" Chacko v. Texas a & M University
S.D. Tex. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See 829 F.2d 1343, 1350-52 (5th Cir.1987), vacated, 492 U.S. 901 , 109 S.Ct. 3207 , 106 L.Ed.2d 558 (1989), reinstated on remand, 887 F.2d 609 (5th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1061 , 110 S.Ct. 1539 , 108 L.Ed.2d 778 (1990).
discussed Cited "see" Richard L. Britt and Timothy Jackson, Jr. v. The Grocers Supply Company, Inc., James E. Hamilton v. The Grocers Supply Company, Inc.
5th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See Guerra v. Manchester Terminal Corp., 498 F.2d 641 , 658 (5th Cir.1974), overruled on other grounds by Bhandari v. First Nat'l Bank of Commerce, 829 F.2d 1343 (5th Cir. 1987), vacated, 492 U.S. 901 , 109 S.Ct. 3207 , 106 L.Ed.2d 558 (1989), reinstated on remand, 887 F.2d 609 (5th Cir.1989), ce rt. denied, 494 U.S. 1061 , 110 S.Ct. 1539 , 108 L.Ed.2d 778 (1990).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Cheung v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
S.D.N.Y. · 1996 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Duane v. GEICO, 37 F.3d 1036, 1042 (4th Cir.1994) (private discrimination prohibited) with Bhandari v. First National Bank of Commerce, 829 F.2d 1343, 1351-52 (5th Cir.1987) (private discrimination not prohibited), vacated, 492 U.S. 901 , 109 S.Ct. 3207 , 106 L.Ed.2d 558 (1989), reinstated on remand 887 F.2d 609 (5th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1061 , 110 S.Ct. 1539 , 108 L.Ed.2d 778 (1990).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
55 Fair empl.prac.cas. 226, 53 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 39,761 Jeetendra Bhandari
v.
First National Bank of Commerce
85-3445.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.
Nov 2, 1989.
887 F.2d 609
Mark G. Murov, Rita K. Ward, Murov & Ward, New Orleans, La., for plaintiff-appellant., John T. Nockleby, Sr. Litigation Atty., MALDEF, E. Richard Larson, Los Angeles, Cal., for amicus curiae Mexican-American Legal Defense Fund., Dando B. Cellini, Bennet S. Koren, Susan E. Santiago, New Orleans, La., for amicus curiae Consumer Bankers and La. Bankers, etc., James B. Irwin, Marta Alison Richards, Montgomery, Barnett, Brown & Read, New Orleans, La., for defendant-appellee.
Clark, Gee, Reavley, Politz, King, Johnson, Williams, Garwood, Jolly, Higginbotham, Davis, Jones, Smith, Duhé.
Cited by 21 opinions  |  Published

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, GEE, REAVLEY, POLITZ, KING, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH and DUHÉ, * Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

In Bhandari v. First National Bank of Commerce, 829 F.2d 1343 (5th Cir.1987) (en banc), we held that the protections of 42 U.S.C. Section 1981 do not extend to prohibit alienage discrimination by private persons, despite the Supreme Court authority of Runyon v. McCrary, 427 U.S. 160, 96 S.Ct. 2586, 49 L.Ed.2d 415 (1976) that those protections do extend to prohibit racial discrimination by such persons. On writ of certiorari, the Supreme Court has now vacated our judgment and remanded Bhandari to us “for further consideration in light of Patterson v. McLean Credit Union, 491 U.S. -, [109 S.Ct. 2363, 105 L.Ed.2d 132] (1989).” Having done so, we conclude that Patterson does not bear on our earlier decision; and we therefore reinstate that decision.

In Patterson, so far as is material here, the Court reaffirmed its decision in Runyon, declining to retreat from that holding despite having requested briefing on the question whether it was correctly decided. We arrived at our earlier en banc decision of this appeal in full recognition of the authority of Runyon, albeit expressing reservations along the way regarding its analysis; and its reaffirmance does not alter the precedential landscape that we must take into account in any relevant way. Those who dissented from our original en banc decision, while adhering to the views they there expressed on the merits of the issues, concur with the remainder of our court that Patterson does not affect today’s decision. [1] Our earlier mandate is therefore reinstated; it is so

ORDERED.

1

. These are Judges Reavley, Politz, King, Johnson, Jerre S. Williams and W. Eugene Davis.