No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
HARDIN’S BAKERY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
RETAIL, WHOLESALE, AND DEPARTMENT STORE; UNION, AFL-CIO, and United Bakery and Confectionery Workers Union, Local No. 441, Defendants-Appellants
v.
RETAIL, WHOLESALE, AND DEPARTMENT STORE; UNION, AFL-CIO, and United Bakery and Confectionery Workers Union, Local No. 441, Defendants-Appellants
88-7469.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Jan 17, 1990.
George C. Longshore, Birmingham, Ala., for defendants-appellants., John K. Anderson, Kevin P. Hishta, Arnold & Anderson, Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiff-appellee.
, Anderson, Clark, Cox, Edmondson, Fay, Hatchett, Johnson, Kravitch, Tjoflat.
Published
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, CLARK, EDMONDSON and COX, Circuit Judges. * [*1189] BY THE COURT:A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc with oral argument during the week of June 11, 1990, on a date hereafter to be fixed. The clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of en banc briefs. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.