Robert M. Kaney v. Louis W. Sullivan, Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 898 F.2d 146 (4th Cir. 1990). · Go Syfert
Search
Robert M. Kaney v. Louis W. Sullivan, Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 898 F.2d 146 (4th Cir. 1990). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
62 citation events (10 in the last 25 years) across 13 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Yu v. Highland Noodles, Inc. (txed, 2025-10-06)
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990 2008 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Yu v. Highland Noodles, Inc.
E.D. Tex. · 2025 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lowry v. Celotex Corp., 898 F.2d 146 (4th Cir. 1990) (no due process issue existed because prior to imposing “the jury costs pursuant to the rule, the parties were notified of the court’s intent to explore the issue at a hearing . . . .”).
discussed Cited "see" Rassa v. Rollins Protective Services Co.
D. Maryland · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lee v. Baxter Healthcare *543 Corp., 721 F.Supp. 89, 96 (D.Md.1989), aff'd, 898 F.2d 146 , 1990 WL 27325 (4th Cir.1990) (holding that plaintiffs breach of warranty claim against manufacturer of breast prosthesis was barred by § 2-725 where plaintiff received implants on March 3, 1976 and failed to commence action by March 3, 1980).
discussed Cited "see" Burton Ex Rel. Republican Party v. Sheheen
D.S.C. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See NAACP v. South Carolina Democratic Party et al., No. 88-2492 (D.S.C. filed February 22, 1989), aff'd, 898 F.2d 146 (4th Cir.1990). 49 For example, the testimony regarding the strength of polarization exhibited in some races, such as the 1990 governor’s race, was minimized by factors such as incumbency.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Sherin v. John Crane-Houdaille, Inc.
D. Maryland · 2014 · signal: see also · confidence low
Reiter v. Pneumo Abex, LLC, 417 Md. 57 , 8 A.3d 725 (2010); see also Lee v. Baxter Health Care Corp., 898 F.2d 146 (4th Cir.1990) (applying Maryland law). .
cited Cited "see, e.g." Donald T. Athey v. National Survival Games, Incorporated Uvex Winter Optical, Incorporated
4th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Lee v. Baxter, 721 F.Supp. 89 (D.Md.1989), aff'd, 898 F.2d 146 (4th Cir.1990).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Robert M. Kaney
v.
Louis W. Sullivan, Secretary of Health and Human Services
89-3270.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Mar 2, 1990.
898 F.2d 146
Unpublished

898 F.2d 146
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Robert M. KANEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Louis W. SULLIVAN, Secretary of Health and Human Services,
Defendant-Appellee.

No. 89-3270.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Argued: Dec. 6, 1989.
Decided: March 2, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. C. Weston Houck, District Judge. (CA-87-2744-2B)

Argued: Mary J. Wiesen-Kosinski, Aiken, S.C., for appellant.

Cheryl Lynn Nikonovich-Kahn, Assistant Regional Counsel, Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, Ga., for appellee.

On Brief: Stuart E. Schiffer, Assistant Attorney General; Bruce R. Granger, Chief Counsel; Mack A. Davis, Deputy Chief Counsel for Social Security Litigation and Problems; Mary Ann Sloan, Principal Regional Counsel; David L. Stephens, Assistant Regional Counsel, Office of General Counsel, Department of Health and Human Services, Vinton D. Lide, United States Attorney, Atlanta, Ga., for appellee.

D.S.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, CHAPMAN and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Robert M. Kaney appeals from the judgment of the district court affirming the Secretary of Health and Human Services' ruling that he was not disabled within the meaning of the Social Security Act and thus was not entitled to disability insurance benefits under the Act, 42 U.S.C. Secs. 416(i), 423(d). Kaney contends that the Secretary based his ruling on an erroneous assessment of both his visual acuity and his residual capacity to perform work. The district court rejected Kaney's arguments and held that substantial evidence supported the Secretary's decision. We have reviewed the briefs of counsel and heard oral argument. We agree with the district court that the Secretary's ruling was supported by substantial evidence, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 405(g), and we thus affirm its judgment.