Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Viking Elec., Inc., 898 F.2d 154 (6th Cir. 1990). · Go Syfert
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Viking Elec., Inc., 898 F.2d 154 (6th Cir. 1990). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
59 citation events (18 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: David Plyler v. Eric Rokosky (mdd, 2026-01-21)
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990 2008 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" David Plyler v. Eric Rokosky
D. Maryland · 2026 · signal: see · confidence high
ANALYSIS It is the responsibility of the United States Attorney General, the Department of Justice, and the BOP to compute sentences of prisoners committed to the custody of the United States or the District of Columbia, and to apply jail credit where due. 18 U.S.C. § 3624 ; see Leavis v. White, 898 F.2d 154 (6th Cir. 1990) (citing United States v. Norman, 767 F.2d 455, 457 (8th Cir. 1985)); United States v. Clayton, 588 F.2d 1288, 1292 (9th Cir. 1979).
discussed Cited "see" Oliver v. Warden
D. Maryland · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
See 18 U.S.C. § 3624 , see also Leavis v. White, 898 F.2d 154 (6th Cir. 1990) (citing United States v. Norman, 767 F.2d 455, 457 (8th Cir. 1985)); United States v. Clayton, 588 F.2d 1288, 1292 (9th Cir. 1979); see also United States v. Mitchell, 845 F.2d 951, 952 (11th Cir. 1988) (“[A] federal district court does not have jurisdiction to entertain a federal prisoner’s petition for jail time credit until the prisoner has exhausted his administrative remedies with the Attorney General under 18 U.S.C. § 3568 .”).
discussed Cited "see" Brotherton v. Carter
D. Maryland · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
It is the responsibility of the United States Attorney General, the Department of Justice, and the BOP to compute sentences of prisoners committed to the custody of the United States or the District of Columbia, and to apply jail credit when it is due. 18 U.S.C. § 3624 ; see Leavis v. White, 898 F.2d 154 (6th Cir. 1990) (citing United States v. Norman, 767 F.2d 455, 457 (8th Cir. 1985)); United States v. Clayton, 588 F.2d 1288, 1292 (9th Cir. 1979).
discussed Cited "see" Satterthwaite v. Carter
D. Maryland · 2023 · signal: see · confidence high
ANALYSIS It is the responsibility of the United States Attorney General, the Department of Justice, and the BOP to compute sentences of prisoners committed to the custody of the United States or the District of Columbia, and to apply jail credit where due. 18 U.S.C. § 3624 ; see Leavis v. White, 898 F.2d 154 (6th Cir. 1990) (citing United States v. Norman, 767 F.2d 455, 457 (8th Cir. 1985)); United States v. Clayton, 588 F.2d 1288, 1292 (9th Cir. 1979).
discussed Cited "see" White v. Warden, Federal Correctional Institution - Cumberland
D. Maryland · 2023 · signal: see · confidence high
See 18 U.S.C. § 3624 , see also Leavis v. White, 898 F.2d 154 (6th Cir. 1990) (citing United States v. Norman, 767 F.2d 455, 457 (8th Cir.1985)); United States v. Clayton, 588 F.2d 1288, 1292 (9th Cir. 1979).
discussed Cited "see" Dixon v. Warden, Federal Correctional Institution - Cumberland
D. Maryland · 2023 · signal: see · confidence high
See 18 U.S.C. § 3624 , see also Leavis v. White, 898 F.2d 154 (6th Cir. 1990) (citing United States v. Norman, 767 F.2d 455, 457 (8th Cir.1985)); United States v. Clayton, 588 F.2d 1288, 1292 (9th Cir. 1979).
discussed Cited "see" Mardis v. Carter
D. Maryland · 2023 · signal: see · confidence high
See 18 U.S.C. § 3624 , see also Leavis v. White, 898 F.2d 154 (6th Cir. 1990) (citing United States v. Norman, 767 F.2d 455, 457 (8th Cir.1985)); United States v. Clayton, 588 F.2d 1288, 1292 (9th Cir. 1979); see also United States v. Mitchell, 845 F.2d 951, 952 (11th Cir.1988) (“[A] federal district court does not have jurisdiction to entertain a federal prisoner’s petition for jail time credit until the prisoner has exhausted his administrative remedies with the Attorney General under 18 U.S.C. §3568 .”).
discussed Cited "see" Hoss v. Warden
D. Maryland · 2022 · signal: see · confidence high
See 18 U.S.C. § 3624 , see also Leavis v. White, 898 F.2d 154 (6th Cir. 1990) (citing United States v. Norman, 767 F.2d 455, 457 (8th Cir.1985)); United States v. Clayton, 588 F.2d 1288, 1292 (9th Cir.1979); see also United States v. Mitchell, 845 F.2d 951, 952 (11th Cir.1988) (“[A] federal district court does not have jurisdiction to entertain a federal prisoner's petition for jail time credit until the prisoner has exhausted his administrative remedies with the Attorney General under 18 U.S.C. § 3568 .”).
discussed Cited "see" Johnson v. Warden
D. Maryland · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
See 18 U.S.C. § 3624 , see also Leavis v. White, 898 F.2d 154 (6th Cir. 1990) (citing United States v. Norman, 767 F.2d 455, 457 (8th Cir.1985)); United States v. Clayton, 588 F.2d 1288, 1292 (9th Cir.1979).
discussed Cited "see" Samuel I. PRATHER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DAYTON POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee
6th Cir. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See Jones v. City of Cleveland, 898 F.2d 154 (6th Cir.1990) (unpublished per curiam); Singleton v. Kellogg Co., 890 F.2d 417 (6th Cir.1989) (unpublished per curiam) ("In light of Patterson , plaintiff's claim of racially discriminatory discharge is no longer cognizable under section 1981"). .
discussed Cited "see" Wilmer v. Tennessee Eastman Co.
6th Cir. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See Jones v. City of Cleveland, 898 F.2d 154 (6th Cir.1990) (discharge claim); Bell v. Krogers, Inc., 897 F.2d 529 (6th Cir.1990) (transfer claim); Singleton v. Kellogg Co., 890 F.2d 417 (6th Cir.1989) (discharge claim); Becton v. Burlington N. R.R., 878 F.2d 1436 (6th Cir.1989) (claims of harassment and demotion).
discussed Cited "see" 54 Fair empl.prac.cas. 743, 55 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 40,400, 6 indiv.empl.rts.cas. 186 Harvey Wilmer v. Tennessee Eastman Company, a Division of Eastman Kodak
6th Cir. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See Jones v. City of Cleveland, 898 F.2d 154 (6th Cir.1990) (discharge claim); Bell v. Krogers, Inc., 897 F.2d 529 (6th Cir.1990) (transfer claim); Singleton v. Kellogg Co., 890 F.2d 417 (6th Cir.1989) (discharge claim); Becton v. Burlington N. R.R., 878 F.2d 1436 (6th Cir.1989) (claims of harassment and demotion).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Laws v. Warden
D. Maryland · 2024 · signal: see also · confidence low
Discussion It is the responsibility of the United States Attorney General, the Department of Justice, and the Bureau of Prisons to compute sentences of prisoners committed to the custody of the United States or the District of Columbia and apply credit where it is due. 18 U.S.C. § 3624 ; see also Leavis v. White, 898 F.2d 154 (6th Cir. 1990) (citing United States v. Norman, 767 F.2d 455, 457 (8th Cir. 1985)); United States v. Clayton, 588 F.2d 1288, 1292 (9th Cir. 1979).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Martin v. Warden
D. Maryland · 2023 · signal: see also · confidence low
See 18 U.S.C. § 3624 ; see also Leavis v. White, 898 F.2d 154 (6th Cir. 1990) (citing United States v. Norman, 767 F.2d 455, 457 (8th Cir.1985)); United States v. Clayton, 588 F.2d 1288, 1292 (9th Cir.1979); United States v. Mitchell, 845 F.2d 951, 952 (11th Cir.1988).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Rivera-Calcano v. Beard
D. Maryland · 2022 · signal: see also · confidence low
See 18 U.S.C. § 3624 ; see also Leavis v. White, 898 F.2d 154 (6th Cir. 1990) (citing United States v. Norman, 767 F.2d 455, 457 (8th Cir.1985)); United States v. Clayton, 588 F.2d 1288, 1292 (9th Cir.1979).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
National Labor Relations Board
v.
Viking Electric, Inc.
90-5242.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Mar 23, 1990.
898 F.2d 154
Unpublished

898 F.2d 154

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,
v.
VIKING ELECTRIC, INC., Respondent.

No. 90-5242.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

March 23, 1990.

JUDGMENT

1

Before RALPH B. GUY, Jr. and BOGGS, Circuit Judges, and AVERN COHN, District Judge[*].

JUDGMENT

2

THIS CAUSE was submitted upon the application of the National Labor Relations Board for the enforcement of a certain order issued by it against Respondent, Viking Electric, Inc., its officers, agents, successors, and assigns, on January 3, 1990, in a proceeding before the said Board numbered 7-CA-29456; upon the transcript of the record in said proceeding, certified and filed in this Court enforcing the order.

3

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is ordered and adjudged by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit that the said order of the National Labor Relations Board be, and the same is hereby enforced; and that Respondent, Viking Electric, Inc., its officers, agents, successors, and assigns, abide by and perform the directions of the Board in said order contained.

4

Mandate shall issue forthwith.

*

The Honorable Avern Cohn, U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation