green
Positive treatment
5.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
(PC) Martinez v. Galvin
See Crofton v. Roe, 170 F.3d 957, 961 (9th Cir. 1999) (as 12 amended); see Davis v. Goord, 320 F.3d 346, 351 (2d Cir. 2003); Smith v. Maschner, 899 F.2d 13 940, 944 (10th Cir. 1990); Watkins v. Curry, 2011 WL 5079532 , at *4 (N.D.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Reed Sr v. Aramark
Fowler v. Jones, 899 F.2d 13 1088, 1095 (11th Cir. 1990).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Erickson v. Biogen, Inc
DISCUSSION 11 A. Defendant’s Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law 12 “Jury verdicts are due considerable deference.” Kern v. Levolor Lorentzen, Inc., 899 F.2d 13 772, 775 (9th Cir. 1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
CA Dept. of Toxic Substances Control v. Chevron Oronite Co. LLC
See Cannons, 899 F.2d 13 at 88 (“Common sense suggests that a [participating party’s] assumption of open- 14 ended risks may merit a discount on comparative fault, while obtaining a complete 15 release from uncertain future liability may call for a premium.” (citations omitted)). 16 Because the Participating Parties are assuming responsibility of managing the future 17 post-closure operations of the Facility and are assuming the risk of future responses 18 which may occur more frequently or be more costly than anticipated, the significant 19 discount in the initial payment, and the disco…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Shinn
v.
R.D. Werner Company
v.
R.D. Werner Company
89-4740.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Mar 19, 1990.
Published
Shinn
v.
R.D. Werner Company[*]
NO. 89-4740
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
MAR 19, 1990
1
Appeal From: W.D.La.
2
AFFIRMED.
*
Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 5th Cir.R. 34.2