United States v. Thomas Lee Maynard, 911 F.2d 725 (4th Cir. 1990). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Thomas Lee Maynard, 911 F.2d 725 (4th Cir. 1990). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
47 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Dekattu v. McFadden (ncwd, 2022-11-17)
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990 2008 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Dekattu v. McFadden
W.D.N.C. · 2022 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Naqvi, 911 F.2d 725 (4th Cir. 1990) (unpublished table decision) (“It is well-settled that a motion under section 2255 is not proper while an appeal from the conviction [or sentence] is pending since disposition of the appeal may make the motion unnecessary”) (cleaned up); United States v. Gordon, 634 F.2d 638, 638-39 (1st Cir. 1980); United States v. Davis, 604 F.2d 474, 484 (7th Cir. 1979). 3 Chief United States District Judge, Middle District of North Carolina, assigned to this case by designation of the Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Four…
cited Cited "see" United States v. Carl Robert Christy, United States of America v. Carl Robert Christy
4th Cir. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Christy, 911 F.2d 725 (4th Cir.1990).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Thomas Lee Maynard
90-6569.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Aug 22, 1990.
911 F.2d 725
Unpublished

911 F.2d 725
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Thomas Lee MAYNARD, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 90-6569.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 9, 1990.
Decided July 24, 1990.
Rehearing Denied Aug. 22, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (C/A No. 90-401-JFM; CR No. 88-278-JFM)

Thomas Lee Maynard, appellant pro se.

Lisa M. Griffin, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Md., for appellee.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before SPROUSE and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Thomas Lee Maynard appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255.[*] Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Maynard, C/A No. 90-401-JFM; CR No. 88-278-JFM (D.Md. Apr. 17, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

*

Because his petition attacks the execution of his sentence, we interpret his petition as one under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2241