Powell (Richard, Mary Ellen) v. U.S. Gypsum Co., L & W Supply Corp., U.S.G. Corp., 914 F.2d 244 (3rd Cir. 1990). · Go Syfert
Search
Powell (Richard, Mary Ellen) v. U.S. Gypsum Co., L & W Supply Corp., U.S.G. Corp., 914 F.2d 244 (3rd Cir. 1990). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
52 citation events (15 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Lovelace v. Anderson (mdctspecapp, 1999-06-03)
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990 2008 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Lovelace v. Anderson
Md. Ct. Spec. App. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Rodriguez v. City of Passaic, *696 730 F.Supp. 1314, 1322 (D.N.J.), aff'd, 914 F.2d 244 (3d Cir.1990).
cited Cited "see" Ron Tirapelli Ford, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, and General Chauffeurs, Sales Drivers, and Helpers Union Local No. 179, Intervening
7th Cir. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hall Indus., 293 N.L.R.B. 785 (1989), enforcing mem., 914 F.2d 244 (3d Cir.1990).
cited Cited "see" Kocienski v. City of Bayonne
D.N.J. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See Rodriguez v. City of Passaic, 730 F.Supp. 1314, 1321 (D.N.J.1990), aff'd, 914 F.2d 244 (3rd Cir.1990).
cited Cited "see, e.g." HACKETT v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
D.N.J. · 2025 · signal: see also · confidence low
Br. at 13; see also id. at 28−31).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Mitchell
E.D. Pa. · 2002 · signal: see also · confidence low
Legal Standard Pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33, “[o]n defendant’s motion, the court may grant a new trial to that defendant if the interests of justice so require.” Fed.R.Crim.P. 33; see also United States v. Bevans, 728 F.Supp. 340, 343 (E.D.Pa.1990), aff'd 914 F.2d 244 (3d Cir.1990). “ ‘The decision whether to grant a motion for a new trial under Rule 33 is committed to the sound discretion of the trial court, which may set aside the verdict and order a new trial if it ascertains that the verdict constitutes a miscarriage of justice.’” United States v. Zimmerm…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Abraham v. Raso (2×)
D.N.J. · 1998 · signal: see also · confidence low
Id. 924 F.Supp. at 657 ; see also Rodriguez v. City of Passaic, 730 F.Supp. 1314 , 1323 n. 15 (D.N.J.), aff'd, 914 F.2d 244 (3d Cir.1990) (table) (“[0]ne must not lose sight of the fact that [the officer] ... [i]s forced to act in the blink of an eye.”).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Perdue Farms, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
E.D.N.C. · 1996 · signal: see also · confidence low
Where the employer “staged the entire electoral process,” the Board properly “nullified] ... the entire scheme.” Id.; see also Hall Industries, Inc., 293 N.L.R.B. 785 , 1989 WL 223957 (1989), aff'd, 914 F.2d 244 (3rd Cir.1990) (Board declared election petition “void ab initio” where employer “actively stimulated the decertification effort.”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Powell (Richard, Mary Ellen)
v.
U.S. Gypsum Company, L & W Supply Corporation, U.S.G. Corporation
90-1010.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Aug 13, 1990.
914 F.2d 244
Published

914 F.2d 244

Powell (Richard, Mary Ellen)
v.
U.S. Gypsum Company, L & W Supply Corporation, U.S.G. Corporation

NO. 90-1010

United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.

AUG 13, 1990

Appeal From: E.D.Pa.,

Kelly, J.

1

AFFIRMED.