Appeal of Woodham (James C.), 914 F.2d 246 (3rd Cir. 1990). · Go Syfert
Search
Appeal of Woodham (James C.), 914 F.2d 246 (3rd Cir. 1990). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Chalmers (nysd, 2007-02-22)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Chalmers
S.D.N.Y. · 2007 · confidence medium
The Second Circuit has not adopted a convergence requirement, see United States v. Eisen, 914 F.2d 246, 253 (2d Cir.1992), and has explicitly held that lack of convergence is not a bar to a claim of wire or mail fraud.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Appeal of Woodham (James C.)
90-5096.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Aug 7, 1990.
914 F.2d 246
Published

914 F.2d 246

Appeal of Woodham (James C.)

NO. 90-5096

United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.

AUG 07, 1990

1

Appeal From: M.D.Pa.

2

AFFIRMED.