green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.5 score
“the defendants have not itemized the copies they claim were necessarily obtained for use of the case and those that were for their own convenience. the court will, therefore, not award the defendants costs for photocopying.”
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
IN RE SKANSKA USA CIVIL SOUTHEAST INC AND SKANSKA USA INC
the defendants have not itemized the copies they claim were necessarily obtained for use of the case and those that were for their own convenience. the court will, therefore, not award the defendants costs for photocopying.
cited
Cited "see"
Florida Keys Citizens Coalition, Inc. v. United States Army Corps of Engineers
See Desisto College, Inc. v. Town of Howey-in-the-Hills, 718 F.Supp. 906, 912 (M.D.Fla.1989), aff'd, 914 F.2d 267 (11th Cir.1990). 2.
cited
Cited "see"
Cappeletti Bros., Inc. v. Broward County
See Desisto College, Inc. v. Town of Howey-In-The-Hills, 718 F.Supp. 906, 914 (M.D.Fla.1989), aff'd, 914 F.2d 267 (11th Cir.1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Deaton v. Dreis & Krump Manufacturing Co.
Accord Desisto College v. Town of Howey-in-the-Hills, 718 F.Supp. 906, 914 (M.D.Fla.1989), aff'd, 914 F.2d 267 (11th Cir.1990); Sack v. Carnegie Mellon University, 106 F.R.D. 561, 564 (W.D.Pa.1985); cf. Newman v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad Co., 781 F.2d 55, 56 (6th Cir.1985) (district court did not abuse its discretion in denying costs for videotaped deposition “which was of limited probative value to the jury in view of the other evidence in the case”); Roberts v. Homelite Division of Textron, Inc., 117 F.R.D. 637, 640 (N.D.Ind.1987) (costs disallowed when prevailing party had previousl…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Joseph v. Nichell's Caribbean Cuisine, Inc.
See e.g., Desisto College v. Town of Howey-in-the-Hills, 718 F.Supp. 906, 913 (M.D.Fla.1989) (holding that “[c]opies attributable to discovery, copies of pleadings, correspondence, documents tendered to the opposing party, copies of exhibits, and documents prepared for the court’s consideration are recoverable”), aff'd, 914 F.2d 267 (11th Cir.1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Goodwall Construction Co. v. Beers Construction Co.
Co., 143 F.R.D. 292, 300 (N.D.Ga.1991); see also Desisto College v. Town of Howey-In-The-Hills, 718 F.Supp. 906, 913-14 (M.D.Fla. 1989), affd, 914 F.2d 267 (11th Cir.1990) (movant must distinguish between copies for the convenience of counsel and those necessary for the case).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Desisto College, Inc.
v.
Line
v.
Line
89-3559.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Aug 22, 1990.
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
Citer courts: N.D. Florida (1)
Desisto College, Inc.
v.
Line[**]
NO. 89-3559
United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.
AUG 22, 1990
Appeal From: M.D.Fla., 718 F.Supp. 906
1
AFFIRMED.
**
Local Rule 36 case